ETV Bharat / sitara

'దేవకి కాదు... మీరు నా దొరసాని'

పూర్తిస్థాయి గ్రామీణ నేపథ్యంతో తెరకెక్కిన 'దొరసాని' సినిమా టీజర్​ ఆకట్టుకునేలా ఉంది. ఆనంద్ దేవరకొండ, శివాత్మిక హీరోహీరోయిన్లుగా పరిచయమవుతున్నారు. జులై 5న ప్రేక్షకుల ముందుకు రానుందీ సినిమా.

author img

By

Published : Jun 6, 2019, 9:47 AM IST

'దేవకి కాదు... మీరు నా దొరసాని'

హీరో విజయ్ దేవరకొండ తమ్ముడు ఆనంద్ దేవరకొండ హీరోగా పరిచయమవుతున్న సినిమా 'దొరసాని'. హీరో రాజశేఖర్​ కుమార్తె శివాత్మిక ఈ సినిమాతో​ హీరోయిన్​గా టాలీవుడ్​లోకి ఎంట్రీ ఇస్తోంది. ఫస్ట్​లుక్​తోనే ఆసక్తి రేపిన చిత్రబృందం నేడు టీజర్​ను విడుదల చేసింది. ఆద్యంతం ఆసక్తికరంగా సాగుతూ ఆకట్టుకునేలా ఉంది.

1980ల నాటి తెలంగాణలోని ఓ గ్రామంలో సాధారణ యువకుడు రాజు, ఎగువ తరగతి అమ్మాయి దేవకిల మధ్య ప్రేమాయణమే ఈ చిత్ర కథ. పూర్తిస్థాయి గ్రామీణ నేపథ్యంలో సినిమా ఉండనుందని టీజర్ స్పష్టం చేస్తోంది. ఈ సినిమాను నూతన దర్శకుడు కేవీఆర్ మహేంద్ర తెరకెక్కించారు. యశ్.రంగినేని, మధుర శ్రీధర్ నిర్మాతలుగా వ్యవహరించారు. జులై 5న ఈ సినిమా ప్రేక్షకుల ముందుకు రానుంది.

హీరో విజయ్ దేవరకొండ తమ్ముడు ఆనంద్ దేవరకొండ హీరోగా పరిచయమవుతున్న సినిమా 'దొరసాని'. హీరో రాజశేఖర్​ కుమార్తె శివాత్మిక ఈ సినిమాతో​ హీరోయిన్​గా టాలీవుడ్​లోకి ఎంట్రీ ఇస్తోంది. ఫస్ట్​లుక్​తోనే ఆసక్తి రేపిన చిత్రబృందం నేడు టీజర్​ను విడుదల చేసింది. ఆద్యంతం ఆసక్తికరంగా సాగుతూ ఆకట్టుకునేలా ఉంది.

1980ల నాటి తెలంగాణలోని ఓ గ్రామంలో సాధారణ యువకుడు రాజు, ఎగువ తరగతి అమ్మాయి దేవకిల మధ్య ప్రేమాయణమే ఈ చిత్ర కథ. పూర్తిస్థాయి గ్రామీణ నేపథ్యంలో సినిమా ఉండనుందని టీజర్ స్పష్టం చేస్తోంది. ఈ సినిమాను నూతన దర్శకుడు కేవీఆర్ మహేంద్ర తెరకెక్కించారు. యశ్.రంగినేని, మధుర శ్రీధర్ నిర్మాతలుగా వ్యవహరించారు. జులై 5న ఈ సినిమా ప్రేక్షకుల ముందుకు రానుంది.

ఇది చదవండి: బాలీవుడ్​ ఓ మై బేబీగా శ్రద్ధాకపూర్​..!

RESTRICTION SUMMARY: AP CLIENTS ONLY
SHOTLIST:
ASSOCIATED PRESS - AP CLIENTS ONLY
New York - June 5, 2019
1. Various exteriors of federal courthouse
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Neumeister, Associated Press Reporter:
"Opponents of adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census claimed in court papers last week that a Republican operative, really, who is an expert on gerrymandering was influential in adding that question. They said that the Justice Department had covered that up and tried to hide it during court proceedings before a judge in Manhattan Federal Court last year. So today, that judge said that the allegations were serious, not frivolous, as the government had maintained. But he also said he did not want to interfere with the Supreme Court, which is expected to decide by July whether the citizenship question can legally be added to the 2020 census."
US GOVERNMENT HANDOUT - AP CLIENTS ONLY
Undated
3. Various screengrabs of paperwork filed with court showing a study done by Republican operative Tom Hofeller arguing that adding a citizenship question would be beneficial to Republicans
ASSOCIATED PRESS - AP CLIENTS ONLY
New York - June 5, 2019
4. Various court exteriors
5. SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Neumeister, Associated Press Reporter:
"Opponents of adding the question say that it will discourage many immigrants from participating in the census. As a result, they won't be counted in the census and particularly areas with large numbers of immigrants, which happen often to be the states that vote predominantly Democrat will not have the same congressional representation or the federal funding that they would otherwise get. And that's why those who oppose it say it's unfair, improper and should be not allowed."
ASSOCIATED PRESS - AP CLIENTS ONLY
ARCHIVE: New York - 2011, exact date unknown
6. Various of people on street in minority neighborhood
7. Various of 2010 census documents ++SILENT SHOTS++
ASSOCIATED PRESS - AP CLIENTS ONLY
New York - June 5, 2019
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Dale Ho, Director of American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Voting Rights Project, party to lawsuit
"The District Court today where we filed our motion for sanctions based on newly-discovered evidence showing that the purpose of adding this question to the census was not as the administration said all along -- was not to enforce the Voting Rights Act, but rather to dilute the voting power of communities of color. Based on that evidence, we came into court today and the court said that our allegations and the evidence was very serious and set a schedule for further briefing and further proceedings here."
9. Wide of press conference
10. SOUNDBITE (English) Dale Ho, Director of American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Voting Rights Project, party to lawsuit
"That's one thing, I think that's a big positive that came out of today's ruling is that the court dismissed that idea. He said that these this new evidence is not frivolous, that it's a very serious issue here, he's taking it very seriously. So we're very glad about that and we look forward to getting to the bottom of what actually happened here."
11. US flag at courthouse
12. SOUNDBITE (English) John Friedman, attorney arguing case
"We want to get the truth out. The Supreme Court, we think no matter what it decides (in its case regarding the citizenship question on the U.S. census) is going to be interested in what the truth is."
13. Push of courthouse
STORYLINE:
Allegations that Republicans pushed to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census because they thought it would give white people an electoral advantage are "serious," a judge said Wednesday as he put the matter on a slow track to keep it out of the way of an imminent Supreme Court ruling.
US District Judge Jesse Furman spoke in a crowded New York courtroom where some anticipated he'd quickly get to claims made last week by opponents of the citizenship question.
The high court is considering the Justice Department's appeal of rulings by Furman and two other judges in California and Maryland who concluded that the question was improperly added to the census last year by the Commerce Department without adequate consideration.
Still, he said the new allegations based on documents discovered last summer "are serious." "They are not, as the defendant says, frivolous," he said.
"We're very glad about that and we look forward to getting to the bottom of what actually happened here," said Dale Ho, director of the American Civil Liberties Union Voting Rights Project, which is named in the lawsuit.
Furman said he didn't want to do anything that would seem he was crossing the line and trying to influence the high court. He set dates for submission of written arguments in July and August, after the Supreme Court is expected to rule.
"We want to get the truth out," said John Friedman, an attorney who argued the case at Wednesday's hearing. "The Supreme Court, we think, no matter what it decides, is going to be interested in what the truth is."
He said the newly raised issues don't lend themselves "to a rushed decision" and said whatever the Supreme Court writes may contribute to resolving the new claims.
Opponents say the citizenship question will scare off immigrants and cause a loss in the Congressional representation and federal funding for communities and states where large numbers of immigrants and Democrats reside.
They said in last week's court filing that new evidence shows a Republican redistricting expert pushed the change to help tilt elections to white people and Republicans.
The Justice Department denied it was done for political reasons and blamed opponents of the question of trying to manufacture an "11th-hour" issue to influence or interrupt the high court.
During oral arguments last month, Supreme Court justices seemed divided on the issue along political lines, making it seem that the question would be allowed onto the census.
Furman said he no longer has jurisdiction over the case, though he could issue sanctions or make contempt-of-court findings if it is proven that Republicans unjustly manipulated the government and hid it as the court considered the legality of the change to the census.
Last week, opponents of the question alleged that longtime Republican gerrymandering expert Thomas Hofeller, who has since died, pressured the Trump administration to include the question.
In court papers this week, Justice Department lawyers wrote that the new legal effort by opponents "borders on frivolous, and appears to be an attempt to reopen the evidence in this already-closed case and to drag this court into plaintiffs' eleventh-hour campaign to improperly derail the Supreme Court's resolution of the government's appeal."
===========================================================
Clients are reminded:
(i) to check the terms of their licence agreements for use of content outside news programming and that further advice and assistance can be obtained from the AP Archive on: Tel +44 (0) 20 7482 7482 Email: info@aparchive.com
(ii) they should check with the applicable collecting society in their Territory regarding the clearance of any sound recording or performance included within the AP Television News service
(iii) they have editorial responsibility for the use of all and any content included within the AP Television News service and for libel, privacy, compliance and third party rights applicable to their Territory.
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.