మార్చిలో యాపిల్ నుంచి బడ్జెట్ ఐఫోన్! - యాపిల్ బడ్జెట్ ఫోన్ త్వరలో

బడ్జెట్ ఫోన్ల మార్కెట్లోకి ప్రవేశించేందుకు ప్రముఖ లగ్జరీ గాడ్జెట్స్ తయారీ సంస్థ యాపిల్ సిద్ధమవుతోంది. బడ్జెట్లో లభిస్తున్న ఆండ్రాయిడ్ ఫోన్లకు పోటీగా ఈ ఏడాది మార్చిలో తక్కువ ధరలో యాపిల్ నుంచి ఐఫోన్ను విడుదల చేయనున్నట్లు సమాచారం.

యాపిల్

Published : Jan 23, 2020, 7:59 AM IST

Updated : Feb 18, 2020, 2:01 AM IST

చౌకధరలో ఒక ఐఫోన్‌ను విడుదల చేయాలని అమెరికా దిగ్గజ సంస్థ యాపిల్‌ నిర్ణయించినట్లు సమాచారం. వచ్చే నెల (ఫిబ్రవరి)లోనే దీని తయారీ చేపట్టాలని, మార్చిలో విడుదల చేయాలన్నది సంస్థ ప్రణాళికగా, ఈ అంశంతో సంబంధం ఉన్న వర్గాలు వెల్లడించినట్లు వార్తాసంస్థ బ్లూంబర్గ్‌ తెలిపింది. ప్రపంచ స్మార్ట్‌ఫోన్‌ విపణిలో మరింత వాటా చేజిక్కించుకునేందుకు ఈ పరిణామం దోహద పడుతుందని సంస్థ భావిస్తోంది.

ఈ కొత్త ఫోన్‌ తయారీ పనులను విభజించి, తైవాన్‌కు చెందిన హాన్‌హాయ్‌ ప్రెసిషన్‌ ఇండస్ట్రీ, పెట్రాన్‌ కార్పొరేషన్‌, విస్ట్రన్‌ కార్పొరేషన్‌లకు అప్పగించినట్లు చెబుతున్నారు. ఐఫోన్‌ ఎస్‌ఈ తర్వాత ఇది తక్కువ ధర ఐఫోన్‌గా పేర్కొంటున్నారు.

యాపిల్ బడ్జెట్ ఫోన్ ఇలా ఉండొచ్చు..

2017లో ఆవిష్కరించిన ఐఫోన్‌ 8 తరహాలో 4.7 అంగుళాల తెరతో ఈ ఫోన్‌ ఉంటుందని సమాచారం. హోమ్‌ బటన్‌లో టచ్‌ ఐడీ ఉంటుందని, ముఖాన్ని గుర్తించే పరిజ్ఞానం ఉండబోదని అంటున్నారు. అధునాతన ఫీచర్లున్న ఆండ్రాయిడ్‌ ఫోన్లు 200 డాలర్ల (సుమారు రూ.14,000) లోపే లభిస్తుండగా, ఈ ఐఫోన్‌తో యాపిల్‌ కూడా భారత్‌లో వాటా పెంచుకుంటుందని భావిస్తున్నారు. ఈ ఏడాది ఆఖరులో 5జీ స్మార్ట్‌ఫోన్లను యాపిల్‌ ఆవిష్కరించనుంది.

ఇదీ చూడండి:ఉద్యోగులకు ఈపీఎఫ్‌ ఓ కొత్త సదుపాయం

యాపిల్ బడ్జెట్ ఫోన్ ఇలా ఉండొచ్చు..

ఇదీ చూడండి:ఉద్యోగులకు ఈపీఎఫ్‌ ఓ కొత్త సదుపాయం

RESTRICTION SUMMARY: AP CLIENTS ONLY
SHOTLIST:
SENATE TV - AP CLIENTS ONLY
Washington DC - 22 January 2020
1. Wide, Senate floor
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Rep. Jerrold Nadler, House Impeachment Manager:
"The House managers will now undertake to tell you the story of the president's Ukraine scheme. As we tell this story, it is important to note that the facts before us are not in dispute. There are no close calls. The evidence shows that President Trump unlawfully withheld military assistance appropriated by Congress to aid our ally in order to extort that government into helping him with his reelection, then tried to cover it up when he got caught. This is the story of a corrupt government wide effort that drew in ambassadors, cabinet officials, executive branch agencies and the office of the president. This effort threatened the security of Ukraine in its military struggle with Russia and compromised our own national security interests, because the president cared only about his personal political interests."
3. SOUNDBITE (English) Marie Yovanovitch, former US Ambassador to Ukraine testifying to House impeachment inquiry November 4, 2019:
"There was a great concern. They were worried. She (State Dept. Human Resources officer) just wanted to give me a heads up about this. And, you know, things seem to be going on. And so she just wanted to give me a heads up."
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Rep. Jerrold Nadler, House Impeachment Manager:
"Why was this respected career diplomat abruptly removed from her post? Why was she, in fact, urged by the State Department to catch the first plane home, that she was in danger, she shouldn't wait. At the time, the White House would not say, but today we know the truth. The truth is that Ambassador Yovanovitch was the victim of a smear campaign organized by Rudy Giuliani, amplified by President Trump's allies and designed to give President Trump the pretext they needed to recall her without warning. Mr Giuliani has admitted as much to the press."
++SOUNDBITES SEPARATED BY BLACK++
5. SOUNDBITE (English) Rep. Jerrold Nadler, House Impeachment Manager:
"With Ambassador Yovanovitch out of the way, the first chapter of the Ukraine scheme was complete. Mr. Giuliani and his agents could now apply direct pressure to the Ukrainian government to spread these two falsehoods (about Hunter Biden and Ukraine's hacking of the 2016 US election). And who benefited from this scheme? Who sent Mr. Giuliani to Ukraine in the first place? Of course, we could rephrase that question as the former Republican leader of the Senate, Howard Baker, asked it in 1973. What did the president know and when did he know it?"
6. Wide, Rep. Sylvia Garcia walks to podium
7. SOUNDBITE (English) Rep. Sylvia Garcia, House Impeachment Manager:
"Numerous witnesses testified about the significance of a White House meeting for the political newcomer (Ukraine's new president). A White House meeting would show Ukrainians that America supported Zelenskiy's anti-corruption platform. The clear backing of the president of the United States, Ukraine's most important patron, would also send a powerful message to Russia."
8. Graphic showing text from Trump-Zelenskiy phone call
9. SOUNDBITE (English) Rep. Sylvia Garcia, House Impeachment Manager:
"The quid pro quo scheme was taking shape. Giuliani was publicly advocating for Ukraine to conduct politically motivated investigations, while President Trump refused to schedule an Oval Office meeting for Ukraine's new president. As Ambassador Sondland testified, the scheme to pressure Ukraine to conduct its investigations would only get more insidious with time."
10. Wide, Garcia walking away
STORYLINE:
Opening arguments began Wednesday in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial as House prosecutors outlined his "corrupt scheme" to abuse power and obstruct Congress.
Democratic House managers are making their case that Trump abused his presidential power and should be removed from office.
At the outset of his testimony, House impeachment manager Rep. Jerrold Nadler said, "it is important to note that the facts before us are not in dispute."
"The evidence shows that President Trump unlawfully withheld military assistance appropriated by Congress to aid our ally in order to extort that government into helping him with his reelection, then tried to cover it up when he got caught," Nadler said.
Nadler outlined two schemes, one to link presidential candidate Joe Biden to his son's position with an Ukrainian energy company and a second that alleged it was Ukraine, not Russia, that interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Democrat House managers face the challenge of making the case before a skeptical Republican-held Senate.
Impeachment Manager Rep. Sylvia Garcia testified about the importance of a White House meeting to the young government of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
"A White House meeting would show Ukrainians that America supported Zelenskiy's anti-corruption platform, " Garcia said, adding that the backing of the president of the United States, Ukraine's most important patron, "would also send a powerful message to Russia."
Republicans have for now blocked Democratic motions to immediately call witnesses and subpoena documents.
===========================================================
Clients are reminded:
(i) to check the terms of their licence agreements for use of content outside news programming and that further advice and assistance can be obtained from the AP Archive on: Tel +44 (0) 20 7482 7482 Email: info@aparchive.com
(ii) they should check with the applicable collecting society in their Territory regarding the clearance of any sound recording or performance included within the AP Television News service
(iii) they have editorial responsibility for the use of all and any content included within the AP Television News service and for libel, privacy, compliance and third party rights applicable to their Territory.

Last Updated : Feb 18, 2020, 2:01 AM IST

For All Latest Updates