సోమిశెట్టి వెంకటేశ్వర్లు
ఇవీ చదవండి..
జగన్కు ఓటేస్తే రౌడీ రాజ్యమే: సోమిశెట్టి వెంకటేశ్వర్లు
జగన్కు ఓటేస్తే రాష్ట్రంలో రౌడీ రాజ్యం వస్తుందని తెదేపా జిల్లా అధ్యక్షుడు సోమిశెట్టి వెంకటేశ్వర్లు అన్నారు. కర్నూలు జిల్లా ఆలూరులో ఈ నెల 5న అధినేత చంద్రబాబు హాజరయ్యే సమావేశ ప్రాంగణాన్ని పరిశీలించారు.
సోమిశెట్టి వెంకటేశ్వర్లు
సోమిశెట్టి వెంకటేశ్వర్లు
వైకాపాకు ఓటేస్తే రాష్ట్రంలో రౌడీ రాజ్యం వస్తుందని తెదేపా జిల్లా అధ్యక్షుడు సోమిశెట్టి వెంకటేశ్వర్లు అన్నారు. కర్నూలు జిల్లా ఆలూరులో ఈనెల 5న పార్టీ అధినేత చంద్రబాబు.. ఎన్నికల సభకు హాజరవుతారని చెప్పారు.సభాస్థలిని పరిశీలించారు. ఆదోని, ఆలూరు నియోజకవర్గాలకు సంబంధించి సభ ఆలూరులో జరుగుతుందనీ.. నందికొట్కూరు, పాణ్యం నియోజకవర్గాలకు నందికొట్కూరులో మరోసభ ఏర్పాటుచేశామని వివరించారు. రాష్ట్రాభివృద్ధి తెదేపాతోనే సాధ్యమని స్పష్టం చేశారు.
ఇవీ చదవండి..
RESTRICTION SUMMARY: NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
SHOTLIST:
PARLIAMENT TV – NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
Canberra – 4 April 2019
1. Parliament during debate, Australian Attorney-General Christian Porter standing to speak
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Christian Porter, Australian Attorney-General:
++PARTIALLY OVERLAID WITH WIDE SHOT OF DEBATE+++
"The internet is not an ungoverned space and together we must act to ensure that perpetrators and their accomplices cannot leverage online platforms for the purpose of spreading their violent and extreme fanatical propaganda, these platforms should not be weaponised for evil purposes."
3. The Australian Opposition's Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus speaking
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Dreyfus, Australian Opposition Attorney-General:
"Labor believes that the social media companies must do more in preventing the dissemination of material produced by terrorists, showing off their crimes. And for that reason Labor will, despite reservations I will explain shortly, be supporting the passage of this bill. But I must be clear, this bill is clumsy and flawed in many respects and that is in part because the government has been too cowardly to hold an adequate number of parliamentary sitting days before the election this year and so the parliament is being forced to deal with this bill on a ridiculous timetable."
5. Various of parliament passing legislation
AuBC – NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
Canberra – 4 April 2019
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Mitch Fifield, Australian Communications Minister:
"Today, we are legislating against the weaponisation of social media. We are introducing a tough regime against the misuse and abuse of online platforms. Where social media organisations do the wrong thing, there should absolutely be penalties and under this law, there will be. It's important that we make a very clear statement to these social media organisations that we expect their behaviours to change. Our experience with the kids cyberbullying takedown regime and also with the takedown regime for the nonconsensual sharing of intimate images, is once you legislate, behaviour changes. That's what we expect and that's what we want. So the message is clear, the law is in place, we expect behaviour to change."
7. Fifield and Porter at news conference
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Christian Porter, Australian Attorney-General:
"This is most likely a world first in terms of legislating the conduct of social media and online platforms. And I would make the observation that it appeared to us as a government that there was a near unanimous view amongst Australians that social media platforms had to take more responsibility for their content, that they could not and should not and the law should prevent them from livestreaming or playing acts of the most horrendous violence and there was an expectation that the government would move urgently to ensure that such a law existed which is precisely what we have done today."
PARLIAMENT TV – NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
Canberra – 3 April 2019
9. Australian Senate passing bill
STORYLINE:
Australia's Parliament passed legislation on Thursday that could imprison social media executives if their platforms stream violent images such as the New Zealand mosque shootings.
Critics warn that some of the most restrictive laws about online communication in the democratic world could have unforeseen consequences, including media censorship and reduced investment in Australia.
The conservative government introduced the bills in response to the March 15 attacks in Christchurch in which an Australian white supremacist apparently used a helmet-mounted camera to broadcast live as he shot worshippers in the two mosques.
Australia's government rushed the legislation through the last two days that Parliament sits before elections are expected in May, dispensing with the usual procedure of a committee scrutinising its content first.
"Together we must act to ensure that perpetrators and their accomplices cannot leverage online platforms for the purpose of spreading their violent and extreme propaganda - these platforms should not be weaponised for evil," Attorney-General Christian Porter told Parliament while introducing the bill.
The opposition's spokesman on the attorney-general portfolio, Mark Dreyfus, committed his centre-left Labor Party to support the bill, despite misgivings.
If the Labor Party wins the election, the law would be reviewed by a parliamentary committee.
The bill would make it a crime for social media platforms not to remove "abhorrent violent material" quickly.
The crime would be punishable by three years in prison and a fine of 10.5 million Australian dollars (7.5 million US dollars) or 10% of the platform's annual turnover.
Abhorrent violent material is defined as acts of terrorism, murder, attempted murder, torture, rape and kidnapping.
The material must be recorded by the perpetrator or an accomplice.
Platforms anywhere in the world would face fines of up to AU$840,000 (US$598,000) if they fail to notify Australian Federal Police if they are aware their service was streaming "abhorrent violent conduct" occurring in Australia.
Dreyfus described the bill as "clumsy and flawed."
He described the timetable to pass the bill as "ridiculous."
Labor first saw the legislation late Monday.
The bill could potentially undermine Australia's security cooperation with the United States by requiring U.S. internet providers to share content data with Australian Federal Police in breach of U.S. law, Dreyfus said.
"Labor believes that the social media companies must do more in preventing the dissemination of material produced by terrorists, showing of their crimes, and for that reason Labor will, despite reservations ... be supporting the passage of this bill," Dreyfus said.
An attempt by the minor Greens party and independent lawmakers to have the vote scrutinised by a parliamentary committee was rejected.
The bill passed without debate in the Senate, Australia's upper house of parliament, on Wednesday night.
===========================================================
Clients are reminded:
(i) to check the terms of their licence agreements for use of content outside news programming and that further advice and assistance can be obtained from the AP Archive on: Tel +44 (0) 20 7482 7482 Email: info@aparchive.com
(ii) they should check with the applicable collecting society in their Territory regarding the clearance of any sound recording or performance included within the AP Television News service
(iii) they have editorial responsibility for the use of all and any content included within the AP Television News service and for libel, privacy, compliance and third party rights applicable to their Territory.
SHOTLIST:
PARLIAMENT TV – NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
Canberra – 4 April 2019
1. Parliament during debate, Australian Attorney-General Christian Porter standing to speak
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Christian Porter, Australian Attorney-General:
++PARTIALLY OVERLAID WITH WIDE SHOT OF DEBATE+++
"The internet is not an ungoverned space and together we must act to ensure that perpetrators and their accomplices cannot leverage online platforms for the purpose of spreading their violent and extreme fanatical propaganda, these platforms should not be weaponised for evil purposes."
3. The Australian Opposition's Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus speaking
4. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Dreyfus, Australian Opposition Attorney-General:
"Labor believes that the social media companies must do more in preventing the dissemination of material produced by terrorists, showing off their crimes. And for that reason Labor will, despite reservations I will explain shortly, be supporting the passage of this bill. But I must be clear, this bill is clumsy and flawed in many respects and that is in part because the government has been too cowardly to hold an adequate number of parliamentary sitting days before the election this year and so the parliament is being forced to deal with this bill on a ridiculous timetable."
5. Various of parliament passing legislation
AuBC – NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
Canberra – 4 April 2019
6. SOUNDBITE (English) Mitch Fifield, Australian Communications Minister:
"Today, we are legislating against the weaponisation of social media. We are introducing a tough regime against the misuse and abuse of online platforms. Where social media organisations do the wrong thing, there should absolutely be penalties and under this law, there will be. It's important that we make a very clear statement to these social media organisations that we expect their behaviours to change. Our experience with the kids cyberbullying takedown regime and also with the takedown regime for the nonconsensual sharing of intimate images, is once you legislate, behaviour changes. That's what we expect and that's what we want. So the message is clear, the law is in place, we expect behaviour to change."
7. Fifield and Porter at news conference
8. SOUNDBITE (English) Christian Porter, Australian Attorney-General:
"This is most likely a world first in terms of legislating the conduct of social media and online platforms. And I would make the observation that it appeared to us as a government that there was a near unanimous view amongst Australians that social media platforms had to take more responsibility for their content, that they could not and should not and the law should prevent them from livestreaming or playing acts of the most horrendous violence and there was an expectation that the government would move urgently to ensure that such a law existed which is precisely what we have done today."
PARLIAMENT TV – NO ACCESS AUSTRALIA
Canberra – 3 April 2019
9. Australian Senate passing bill
STORYLINE:
Australia's Parliament passed legislation on Thursday that could imprison social media executives if their platforms stream violent images such as the New Zealand mosque shootings.
Critics warn that some of the most restrictive laws about online communication in the democratic world could have unforeseen consequences, including media censorship and reduced investment in Australia.
The conservative government introduced the bills in response to the March 15 attacks in Christchurch in which an Australian white supremacist apparently used a helmet-mounted camera to broadcast live as he shot worshippers in the two mosques.
Australia's government rushed the legislation through the last two days that Parliament sits before elections are expected in May, dispensing with the usual procedure of a committee scrutinising its content first.
"Together we must act to ensure that perpetrators and their accomplices cannot leverage online platforms for the purpose of spreading their violent and extreme propaganda - these platforms should not be weaponised for evil," Attorney-General Christian Porter told Parliament while introducing the bill.
The opposition's spokesman on the attorney-general portfolio, Mark Dreyfus, committed his centre-left Labor Party to support the bill, despite misgivings.
If the Labor Party wins the election, the law would be reviewed by a parliamentary committee.
The bill would make it a crime for social media platforms not to remove "abhorrent violent material" quickly.
The crime would be punishable by three years in prison and a fine of 10.5 million Australian dollars (7.5 million US dollars) or 10% of the platform's annual turnover.
Abhorrent violent material is defined as acts of terrorism, murder, attempted murder, torture, rape and kidnapping.
The material must be recorded by the perpetrator or an accomplice.
Platforms anywhere in the world would face fines of up to AU$840,000 (US$598,000) if they fail to notify Australian Federal Police if they are aware their service was streaming "abhorrent violent conduct" occurring in Australia.
Dreyfus described the bill as "clumsy and flawed."
He described the timetable to pass the bill as "ridiculous."
Labor first saw the legislation late Monday.
The bill could potentially undermine Australia's security cooperation with the United States by requiring U.S. internet providers to share content data with Australian Federal Police in breach of U.S. law, Dreyfus said.
"Labor believes that the social media companies must do more in preventing the dissemination of material produced by terrorists, showing of their crimes, and for that reason Labor will, despite reservations ... be supporting the passage of this bill," Dreyfus said.
An attempt by the minor Greens party and independent lawmakers to have the vote scrutinised by a parliamentary committee was rejected.
The bill passed without debate in the Senate, Australia's upper house of parliament, on Wednesday night.
===========================================================
Clients are reminded:
(i) to check the terms of their licence agreements for use of content outside news programming and that further advice and assistance can be obtained from the AP Archive on: Tel +44 (0) 20 7482 7482 Email: info@aparchive.com
(ii) they should check with the applicable collecting society in their Territory regarding the clearance of any sound recording or performance included within the AP Television News service
(iii) they have editorial responsibility for the use of all and any content included within the AP Television News service and for libel, privacy, compliance and third party rights applicable to their Territory.
