ETV Bharat / international

Trump's India visit to boost New Delhi-Washington trade

author img

By

Published : Feb 11, 2020, 9:04 PM IST

The Trump administration's trade concessions demand would hit Indian agriculture and the dairy industry hard. It is the duty of New Delhi not to compromise on the interests of the peasantry who work hard for food and keep the nation going.

Representative image
Representative image

Hyderabad: After his recent acquittal from the impeachment proceedings, US President Donald Trump prepares to tour India for the first time in the third week of this month. There are indications that the US-India bilateral trade, which has been under severe strain for some time, is likely to be back on track with concrete solutions.

It is well known that the Trump government, which strongly defends India's active role in global politics, when it comes to trade aspects, is adopting a policy of 'America First' with increased taxes. India also responded equally strongly and the uncomfortable trade situation is unpalatable to both the countries.

Read also: Trump refuses to roll back tariff despite Ph-1 of trade deal with China

Against this backdrop, there are fears that if we agree to the trade concessions demanded by the Trump administration, the domestic agriculture and the dairy industry will greatly suffer.

Read also: Exclusive: India-US Trade, Iranian Crisis and its regional impact for India

As desired by Washington, if tariff and non-tariff barriers are eliminated and the doors of domestic markets are opened for their corn, cotton, soy, wheat, and dry fruit (nuts) products, the Farmers' Unions are worried that it will be catastrophic for us.

The question is whether India, which has more than 15 million small farmers surviving on the dairy income from one or two cows or buffaloes, will be able to withstand the tough competition of the US dairy products which are heavily subsidized.

If American cotton is imported, domestic cotton farmers' lives will be in danger and if genetically modified products are imported, the security of life will be at stake. As Narendra Modi's government voiced strongly the Indian viewpoint on the platform of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in November last and protected the interests of Indian farmers, everyone desires that in dealing with America also we should be free from fear or favor.

Trump wanted to reduce their trade deficit by professing that 'trade wars are good....and can be easily won" and increased taxes on imports from India and China.

When New Delhi and Beijing also increased taxes on American imports, there was an uproar from American farmers. Now Trump is trying to get over the crisis with ad hoc contracts. Though the Trump government has been complaining that, 'For many years India has been levying heavy trade tariffs on America; it has become the king of tariffs,’ the Modi government argues that the tariffs imposed by India on the basis of 'trade volume average' are not much.

On the basis of a complaint from the dairy and medical appliance industry that due to trade restrictions exports were slowing, the US has removed India from the list of GSP (Generalized System of Preferences) in July last.

At a time when India is pushing for a GSP revival, news has already surfaced that the US has been bargaining for a billion-dollar (Rs.71 thousand crores) trade deal and has already succeeded on medical equipment. While India wants simplified import regulation of mangoes, grapes and pomegranate fruits, the US wants to open gates for export of $600 billion of agriculture products.

The Ministry of Commerce had already cautioned in 2015 that if the wish of the US to reduce import tariffs on poultry products becomes a reality and chicken and eggs are imported at very cheap rates, the domestic market will be affected up to 40%.

This unequal competition will hit India very hard. The bilateral share of India's trade volume with the US is hardly three percent. In the last fiscal year, India's exports to the US were $5240 billion and imports $3550 billion. Even if the trade deficit falls to $1690 billion, the Trump government's wish to make big profits by grabbing the Indian market, does not realize the plight of Indian farmers.

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), our government has lost over Rs 2 lakh 65 thousand crores in 2016 alone in the game plan of support prices of governments. Whereas in the same year, China contributed $2,200 billion to its farmers, and the OECD, a 36-nation alliance, supported $1,200 billion!

At a time when the Indian farmer is in deep trouble if American imports are also allowed, his position will be like falling from pan to fire. If the import tariff on poultry is reduced from the present 100% to 30% as desired by the US or undue leniency is shown on dairy imports, it will have a great impact on agro-based industries. It is the duty of the Modi government not to compromise on the interests of the peasantry who work hard for our food and keep the nation going.

Hyderabad: After his recent acquittal from the impeachment proceedings, US President Donald Trump prepares to tour India for the first time in the third week of this month. There are indications that the US-India bilateral trade, which has been under severe strain for some time, is likely to be back on track with concrete solutions.

It is well known that the Trump government, which strongly defends India's active role in global politics, when it comes to trade aspects, is adopting a policy of 'America First' with increased taxes. India also responded equally strongly and the uncomfortable trade situation is unpalatable to both the countries.

Read also: Trump refuses to roll back tariff despite Ph-1 of trade deal with China

Against this backdrop, there are fears that if we agree to the trade concessions demanded by the Trump administration, the domestic agriculture and the dairy industry will greatly suffer.

Read also: Exclusive: India-US Trade, Iranian Crisis and its regional impact for India

As desired by Washington, if tariff and non-tariff barriers are eliminated and the doors of domestic markets are opened for their corn, cotton, soy, wheat, and dry fruit (nuts) products, the Farmers' Unions are worried that it will be catastrophic for us.

The question is whether India, which has more than 15 million small farmers surviving on the dairy income from one or two cows or buffaloes, will be able to withstand the tough competition of the US dairy products which are heavily subsidized.

If American cotton is imported, domestic cotton farmers' lives will be in danger and if genetically modified products are imported, the security of life will be at stake. As Narendra Modi's government voiced strongly the Indian viewpoint on the platform of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in November last and protected the interests of Indian farmers, everyone desires that in dealing with America also we should be free from fear or favor.

Trump wanted to reduce their trade deficit by professing that 'trade wars are good....and can be easily won" and increased taxes on imports from India and China.

When New Delhi and Beijing also increased taxes on American imports, there was an uproar from American farmers. Now Trump is trying to get over the crisis with ad hoc contracts. Though the Trump government has been complaining that, 'For many years India has been levying heavy trade tariffs on America; it has become the king of tariffs,’ the Modi government argues that the tariffs imposed by India on the basis of 'trade volume average' are not much.

On the basis of a complaint from the dairy and medical appliance industry that due to trade restrictions exports were slowing, the US has removed India from the list of GSP (Generalized System of Preferences) in July last.

At a time when India is pushing for a GSP revival, news has already surfaced that the US has been bargaining for a billion-dollar (Rs.71 thousand crores) trade deal and has already succeeded on medical equipment. While India wants simplified import regulation of mangoes, grapes and pomegranate fruits, the US wants to open gates for export of $600 billion of agriculture products.

The Ministry of Commerce had already cautioned in 2015 that if the wish of the US to reduce import tariffs on poultry products becomes a reality and chicken and eggs are imported at very cheap rates, the domestic market will be affected up to 40%.

This unequal competition will hit India very hard. The bilateral share of India's trade volume with the US is hardly three percent. In the last fiscal year, India's exports to the US were $5240 billion and imports $3550 billion. Even if the trade deficit falls to $1690 billion, the Trump government's wish to make big profits by grabbing the Indian market, does not realize the plight of Indian farmers.

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), our government has lost over Rs 2 lakh 65 thousand crores in 2016 alone in the game plan of support prices of governments. Whereas in the same year, China contributed $2,200 billion to its farmers, and the OECD, a 36-nation alliance, supported $1,200 billion!

At a time when the Indian farmer is in deep trouble if American imports are also allowed, his position will be like falling from pan to fire. If the import tariff on poultry is reduced from the present 100% to 30% as desired by the US or undue leniency is shown on dairy imports, it will have a great impact on agro-based industries. It is the duty of the Modi government not to compromise on the interests of the peasantry who work hard for our food and keep the nation going.

ZCZC
PRI ECO GEN INT
.LONDON FGN48
UK-2NDLD MALLYA
Multiple errors in extradition order for Mallya, UK High Court told
By Aditi Khanna
         London, Feb 11 (PTI) Liquor baron Vijay Mallya on Tuesday appeared before the Royal Courts of Justice here for his appeal against extradition to India to face fraud and money laundering charges amounting to Rs 9,000 crores, where his lawyers claimed "multiple errors" in a magistrates' court's order.
         The 64-year-old former Kingfisher Airlines boss, who remains on bail since his arrest on an extradition warrant in April 2017, avoided the usual scrum of reporters at the court entrance and went in with his lawyers separately. "I'm just here to listen, he said, when asked for a comment.
         Justice Stephen Irwin and Justice Elisabeth Laing were told by Mallya's barrister that Chief Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot's verdict in favour of extradition in December 2018 was flawed and also questioned the admissibility of some witness statements submitted by the Indian government.
         Clare Montgomery opened her arguments to try and establish that Mallya had no fraudulent intentions when he sought bank loans for his now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines because he is no "fly by night figure but an immensely wealthy man who was not running any sort of ponzi scheme but a reputable airline, which fell into economic misfortune along with other Indian airlines.
         In what she described as a "very dense case", which has proved extraordinarily difficult to manage as there are any number of rabbit holes to go down, Montgomery said: "She (Arbuthnot) did not look at all of the evidence because if she had, she would not have fallen into the multiple errors that permeate her judgment."
         The hearing is scheduled for three days with Mallya's barrister to lay out her oral arguments, with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on behalf of the Indian government set to counter on Wednesday. A verdict may be handed down at the end of the hearing on Thursday, but judgment could be delayed to a later date depending on how the hearing progresses.
         Representatives from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) were present in court as Montgomery once again sought to raise questions over whether the CBI behaved "properly in bringing charges" against Mallya under former Special Director Rakesh Asthana, who she said may have been guilty of misconduct.
         Judge Irwin intervened to question whether she could re-enter these pervious claims, which had already been rejected at the magistrates' court level and sought clarifications on where the law may have been wrongly applied by the Chief Magistrate.
         Mallya had received permission to appeal against his extradition order signed off by former UK home secretary Sajid Javid last February only on one ground, which challenges the Indian government's prima facie case against him of fraudulent intentions in acquiring bank loans.
         The High Court has already accepted Judge Arbuthnot's conclusions on all other aspects of the extradition case, including so-called extraneous circumstances of Mallya being pursued by the Indian authorities for political reasons of a clash between the ruling BJP and Opposition Congress party.          Some of the other grounds invoked in last year's hearing claimed Mallya would not receive a fair trial in India, which was also dismissed as the judges upheld Arbuthnot's ruling on the matter that the wide media interest in the Mallya case would ensure justice.
         His legal team had also sought to challenge the Indian government's assurances that Mallya would be held in safe prison conditions at Barrack 12 in Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai, which was dismissed by the High Court.
         At the end of a year-long extradition trial at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London in December 2018, Judge Arbuthnot had found clear evidence of dispersal and misapplication of the loan funds and accepted a prima facie case of fraud and a conspiracy to launder money against Mallya, as presented by the CPS on behalf of the Indian government.
         Mallya remains on bail involving a bail bond worth 650,000 pounds and other restrictions on his travel while he contests that ruling. PTI AK ZH AKJ
ZH
ZH
02111918
NNNN
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.