ETV Bharat / bharat

If CAA is bad for ILP-6th schedule areas, how is it good for rest of NE: AASU-NESO

AASU chief adviser and NESO leader Samujjal Bhattacharya on Tuesday challenged the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah to explain their decision to exempt the areas covered under Inner Line Permit (ILP) and Sixth Schedule in the Northeast from the contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Act, barring the rest of the region.

AASU-NESO
AASU-NESO
author img

By

Published : Jan 7, 2020, 9:35 PM IST

New Delhi: The North East Students Organisation (NESO) and the All Assam Students Union (AASU) on Tuesday challenged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah to explain their decision to exempt the areas covered under Inner Line Permit (ILP) and Sixth Schedule in the Northeast from the contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Act, barring the rest of the region.

AASU-NESO

"I would like to challenge PM Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to explain that if CAA is bad for areas covered under Inner Line Permit and Sixth Schedule, then how is it good for the rest of the Northeastern states, " said AASU chief adviser Samujjal Bhattacharya while addressing a press conference in Delhi.

The Inner Line Permit is a document that Indian citizens from other states require to enter Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and most of Nagaland. Even long-time residents who do not belong to communities classified as “indigenous” to these states need the permit, which they need to renew every six months.

The Sixth Schedule, on the other hand, provides for autonomous decentralised self-governance in certain tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura. In these areas, communities not considered local are restricted from owning land and businesses.

Accusing the Bharatiya Janta Party-led government in Assam and at the Centre of imposing CAA to protect "illegal Bangladeshis" Bhattacharya said, "the influx of foreigners is a threat to the language, culture and identity of the indigenous people of Assam and Northeast."

"We would also like to live like a normal citizen of this country, but we are being forced to live like a second class citizen under the rule of illegal Bangladeshis, " said the student leader.

Referring to Union Home Minister's "promise" to form a committee to implement Clause 6 of the Assam Accord, Bhattacharya said, "The Centre is trying to bargain clause 6 for CAA."

"We would like to tell the central government that clause 6 of the Assam Accord is non-negotiable, " added AASU's chief adviser.

Also read: JNUSU Prez demands immediate removal of VC; police says responded on time

After witnessing widespread protests against the Centre's move to implement CAA, several central, as well as state BJP leaders, have been promising the implementation of Clause 6 of the Assam Accord - which provides for "constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards...for the Assamese people".

New Delhi: The North East Students Organisation (NESO) and the All Assam Students Union (AASU) on Tuesday challenged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah to explain their decision to exempt the areas covered under Inner Line Permit (ILP) and Sixth Schedule in the Northeast from the contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Act, barring the rest of the region.

AASU-NESO

"I would like to challenge PM Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to explain that if CAA is bad for areas covered under Inner Line Permit and Sixth Schedule, then how is it good for the rest of the Northeastern states, " said AASU chief adviser Samujjal Bhattacharya while addressing a press conference in Delhi.

The Inner Line Permit is a document that Indian citizens from other states require to enter Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and most of Nagaland. Even long-time residents who do not belong to communities classified as “indigenous” to these states need the permit, which they need to renew every six months.

The Sixth Schedule, on the other hand, provides for autonomous decentralised self-governance in certain tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura. In these areas, communities not considered local are restricted from owning land and businesses.

Accusing the Bharatiya Janta Party-led government in Assam and at the Centre of imposing CAA to protect "illegal Bangladeshis" Bhattacharya said, "the influx of foreigners is a threat to the language, culture and identity of the indigenous people of Assam and Northeast."

"We would also like to live like a normal citizen of this country, but we are being forced to live like a second class citizen under the rule of illegal Bangladeshis, " said the student leader.

Referring to Union Home Minister's "promise" to form a committee to implement Clause 6 of the Assam Accord, Bhattacharya said, "The Centre is trying to bargain clause 6 for CAA."

"We would like to tell the central government that clause 6 of the Assam Accord is non-negotiable, " added AASU's chief adviser.

Also read: JNUSU Prez demands immediate removal of VC; police says responded on time

After witnessing widespread protests against the Centre's move to implement CAA, several central, as well as state BJP leaders, have been promising the implementation of Clause 6 of the Assam Accord - which provides for "constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards...for the Assamese people".

Intro:New Delhi: Accusing the Centre of playing a divide and rule policy over Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the All Assam Students Union (AASU) on Tuesday asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to explain the reason behind excluding Inner Line Permit (ILP) and 6th Schedule areas from the ambit of the Act.

The influential student body from Assam also criticised Assam Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal tagging him as a 'protector of illegal foreigners.'


Body:"The CAA has a provision, wherein the states with ILP and 6th Schedule areas are exempted from the implementation of this Act, as it was understood on the reason that CAA is bad and will have a negative impact on the demography of these areas. Then how can it be good for the other areas of Assam? This is just a ploy to hoodwink and mislead the people," said AASU chief advisor Samujjal Bhattacharya.

He said that Assam and the entire northeast will never accept CAA. "We did Assam agitation against illegal foreigners and now the BJP Governmnet has decided to make the illegal foreigners legal," said Bhattacharya.

"Even Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal who was known as the jatir nayak (mass leader), has betrayed his own people," said Bhattacharya.

It may be mentioned here ILP states including Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland and 6th Schedule areas in the northeast will not come under the jurisdiction of the Act.

"Centre give step motherly attitude to Assam and other northeastern states, so we have come to the national capital to remind that Northeast is with India and we will not accept anymore illegal foreigners in our soil," said Bhattacharya.

The AASU and North East Studnet Organisation (NESO) have jointly organised a press conference in New Delhi to express their views over CAA.

Bhattacharya said that CAA violates the historic Assam Accord of 1985. "The violation of the Assam Accord and imposition of additional burden are not acceptable to us. This is the cause of the present non-violent mass movement in Assam against CAA," said Bhattacharya.

He alleged that with CAA, "BJP want to keep their vote bank intact."


Conclusion:The student leader said that the recent decision of the Government to withdraw The Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulations 1873 on December 11 from Assam is an act of political injustice.

"The Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulations 1873 placed practically the entire state of Assam under ILP system before it was recently withdrawn on December 11. We demand that Assam and whole northeast should be placed under the Regulations to ensure that the illegal immigrants once detected in Assam as per the provisionof the Assam Accord do not re-enter in the region in future illegally," said Bhattacharya.

NESO chairman Samuel Jyrwa said that CAA is unconstitutional as "It defines the citizenshipon the basis of religion."

"The indeginious people of Northeast are deadly against the Act as its implementation will grant citizenship to illegal infiltrators from Bangladesh," said Jyrwa.

Both AASU and NESO have been opposing the Citizenship Act, terming it as the safeguard of illegal Bangladeshis.

end.

ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.