Farmer leaders to consult senior lawyers to decide next course of action
New Delhi: Braving the cold weather, farmers continue to protest on the 23rd day against the three new farm laws. Thousands of farmers have been camping at several Delhi border points for the last 22 days.
Farmers' leaders on Thursday had said they will consult senior lawyers, including Colin Gonsalves, Dushyant Dave and Prashant Bhushan, before deciding the next course of action after the Supreme Court said it was thinking of setting up an "impartial and independent" panel of agriculture experts and peasants' unions to resolve the deadlock over the contentious farm laws.
The protesting farmers' leaders welcomed the apex court's move to acknowledge the right of farmers to non-violent protests but asserted that their agitation will continue till a concrete solution is found.
"We will meet senior lawyers Colin Gonsalves, Dushyant Dave, H S Phoolka and Prashant Bhushan on Friday and consult them about what can be done," Abhimanyu Kohar, a leader of the Rashtriya Kisan Mazdoor Sabha, told.
He said that the Sanyukt Kisan Morcha, an umbrella body of around 40 farmers' unions protesting at Delhi's border points, has not received any notice from the Supreme Court, adding that it will comment on the matter only after seeing a copy of the Court's order.
Senior Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) leader Dharampal Malik said a technical team has been formed by the union, adding that the Centre should first make its stance clear on whether it wants to put the contentious farm laws on hold.
Meanwhile, the protesting farmers observed a two-minute silence on Thursday to pay their respects to Sikh preacher Sant Ram Singh, who allegedly committed suicide at the Singhu border on Wednesday.
Earlier, the Supreme Court had acknowledged the right of farmers to non-violent protests and mooted the idea of putting on hold the contentious farm laws to enable negotiations with the agitating farmers, which was opposed by the Centre, who said the agriculturists would not come forward for the talks then.
The apex court made it clear that the issue of farmers' protest and the right of others to move freely would be dealt on priority at the moment and not the validity of the laws.
The top court said it was of the view that the farmers' right to protest should not infringe the fundamental right of others to move freely and supply of essential food. The right to protest does not mean blocking the entire city.