ETV Bharat / bharat

‘No bar on copper smelter, committee can set conditions for restarting Vedanta plant’, SC to TN govt

When the Tamil Nadu government vehemently opposed reopening of Vedanta plant in Thoothukudi, a three-judge bench of Supreme Court led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud clarified that the country does not bar copper smelter. The CJI further said that a committee will impose conditions and, unless they fulfil the conditions, they cannot restart the Thoothukudi plant, reports Sumit Saxena.

Supreme Court on Vedanta Copper Smelter Plant in Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court on Vedanta Copper Smelter Plant in Tamil Nadu
author img

By ETV Bharat English Team

Published : Feb 21, 2024, 10:11 PM IST

New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Wednesday told the Tamil Nadu government that the country does not bar copper smelter and that the Vedanta plant cannot restart in Thoothukudi if they do not fulfill conditions that are imposed by a committee. However, the state government vehemently opposed the reopening of the plant.

A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and comprising justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra told senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, appearing for Tamil Nadu, that country does not bar copper smelter and reiterated, “there is no bar…”.

Vaidyanathan said committee after committee has found evidence of pollution and insisted that it is a highly polluting industry. He stressed that the apex court has held that economic interests will pave the way for environmental protection interests. The bench asked the state government counsel, why did it give permission for the plant in the first place.

“A committee will impose conditions, unless they fulfil the conditions, they cannot restart the plant….”, the CJI told Vaidyanathan. However, the state government counsel did not budge from his stand and stressed that industry like this is a hazardous industry. Vaidyanathan also pointed out that NEERI has said the permission for the plant should be withdrawn and they went to court and got an interim order to allow them to operate the plant.

During the morning session of the hearing, the bench noted that the court has to protect the health and welfare of the people and “they are voiceless people, and they all cannot come here. We cannot be oblivious to the wider concerns of the community." The bench made this oral observation after senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing Vedanta, contended that the environmental clearance was granted in 2007, and it was never challenged.

The bench observed that it may not be able to direct Vedanta to start operating today, but ensure that terms are put to it by an expert panel regarding restarting a red category industry, and also the company could deposit a certain amount by which it can start by satisfying environmental safeguards.

The CJI told Divan, “We also do not want to find fault with the High Court because if Vedanta applies for renewal, then they can look beyond closure and state of industry today…..If we take upon ourselves and reject the HC order and three years later, we see that there is a leak, then imagine the moral responsibility will be on us….”.

Vedanta has filed a note before the apex court saying that the Supreme Court may appoint a committee of experts comprising representatives of MoEF&CC, NEERI, CPCB, IIT, TNPCB, Vedanta and three independent experts. “It is suggested that the committee be chaired by a retired justice of the Supreme Court of India. The Committee may be requested to submit its report within one month”, said the note.

“The remit of the Committee would be to make recommendations and suggest conditions for resumption of operations at the Petitioner's copper smelter including additional environmental safeguards, if required”, added the note.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing an intervenor Manu Neethi Foundation, in a note submitted in the apex court, said: “In support with the proposal made by the Company during the course of arguments on 14.02.2024, it will be in the interest of justice that Sterlite be directed to start its refurbishing work immediately without any delay at their own cost and risk and not to claim any equity in their favour for the money spent in refurbishing if the expert report were to go against them, as the refurbishing activity itself will give large scale employment to the residents of that area”.

The hearing in the matter will continue on Thursday.

On February 14, the Supreme Court suggested appointing a bipartisan expert committee to take care of concerns of the state government and Vedanta group and explore the possibility of reopening Vedanta’s copper smelting plant in Tamil Nadu’s Thoothukudi. The apex court observed that national interest can’t be overlooked and there are few copper smelters in the country, the nation should not lose this asset.

In 2018, the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) ordered the closure of the controversial Sterlite Plant after massive protests by locals, social and environmental activists who alleged that the facility was causing widespread and severe pollution, leading to the spread of serious diseases among locals. The decision of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board was later upheld by the Madras High Court in August 2020.

  • " class="align-text-top noRightClick twitterSection" data="">

Read More

  1. Closure Of Sterlite Copper Unit In Tamil Nadu: SC To Consider Hearing Plea Of Vedanta
  2. Vedanta Wins Arbitration Against Govt In USD 1.1 Bn Cost Disallowance Case

New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Wednesday told the Tamil Nadu government that the country does not bar copper smelter and that the Vedanta plant cannot restart in Thoothukudi if they do not fulfill conditions that are imposed by a committee. However, the state government vehemently opposed the reopening of the plant.

A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and comprising justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra told senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, appearing for Tamil Nadu, that country does not bar copper smelter and reiterated, “there is no bar…”.

Vaidyanathan said committee after committee has found evidence of pollution and insisted that it is a highly polluting industry. He stressed that the apex court has held that economic interests will pave the way for environmental protection interests. The bench asked the state government counsel, why did it give permission for the plant in the first place.

“A committee will impose conditions, unless they fulfil the conditions, they cannot restart the plant….”, the CJI told Vaidyanathan. However, the state government counsel did not budge from his stand and stressed that industry like this is a hazardous industry. Vaidyanathan also pointed out that NEERI has said the permission for the plant should be withdrawn and they went to court and got an interim order to allow them to operate the plant.

During the morning session of the hearing, the bench noted that the court has to protect the health and welfare of the people and “they are voiceless people, and they all cannot come here. We cannot be oblivious to the wider concerns of the community." The bench made this oral observation after senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing Vedanta, contended that the environmental clearance was granted in 2007, and it was never challenged.

The bench observed that it may not be able to direct Vedanta to start operating today, but ensure that terms are put to it by an expert panel regarding restarting a red category industry, and also the company could deposit a certain amount by which it can start by satisfying environmental safeguards.

The CJI told Divan, “We also do not want to find fault with the High Court because if Vedanta applies for renewal, then they can look beyond closure and state of industry today…..If we take upon ourselves and reject the HC order and three years later, we see that there is a leak, then imagine the moral responsibility will be on us….”.

Vedanta has filed a note before the apex court saying that the Supreme Court may appoint a committee of experts comprising representatives of MoEF&CC, NEERI, CPCB, IIT, TNPCB, Vedanta and three independent experts. “It is suggested that the committee be chaired by a retired justice of the Supreme Court of India. The Committee may be requested to submit its report within one month”, said the note.

“The remit of the Committee would be to make recommendations and suggest conditions for resumption of operations at the Petitioner's copper smelter including additional environmental safeguards, if required”, added the note.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing an intervenor Manu Neethi Foundation, in a note submitted in the apex court, said: “In support with the proposal made by the Company during the course of arguments on 14.02.2024, it will be in the interest of justice that Sterlite be directed to start its refurbishing work immediately without any delay at their own cost and risk and not to claim any equity in their favour for the money spent in refurbishing if the expert report were to go against them, as the refurbishing activity itself will give large scale employment to the residents of that area”.

The hearing in the matter will continue on Thursday.

On February 14, the Supreme Court suggested appointing a bipartisan expert committee to take care of concerns of the state government and Vedanta group and explore the possibility of reopening Vedanta’s copper smelting plant in Tamil Nadu’s Thoothukudi. The apex court observed that national interest can’t be overlooked and there are few copper smelters in the country, the nation should not lose this asset.

In 2018, the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) ordered the closure of the controversial Sterlite Plant after massive protests by locals, social and environmental activists who alleged that the facility was causing widespread and severe pollution, leading to the spread of serious diseases among locals. The decision of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board was later upheld by the Madras High Court in August 2020.

  • " class="align-text-top noRightClick twitterSection" data="">

Read More

  1. Closure Of Sterlite Copper Unit In Tamil Nadu: SC To Consider Hearing Plea Of Vedanta
  2. Vedanta Wins Arbitration Against Govt In USD 1.1 Bn Cost Disallowance Case
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.