For the last few days, the internet has been aflame over gas stoves – specifically, over whether they are harmful to human health. In fact, California lawmakers have passed a bill that would require a warning similar to those on tobacco products. By the end of September, the California state governor is likely to sign the bill into law. This means, the next time you buy a cooking stove in California, don’t be surprised if it shows a warning label..
Recently, Commissioner of the United States Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) Richard Trumka Jr. made comments about the commission’s plans to potentially regulate gas stoves. “Products that can’t be made safe can be banned,” Trumka told a foreign media house. The statement from the CPSC was a result of a series of lawsuits filed against stove manufacturers claiming they should warn the customers about potential health risks. Now, gas cooking has been labeled as “a public health concern” by the American Public Health Association.
While this may be a hot topic of discussion in town, the issue is not new. Scientists have long known that gas stoves emit pollutants that irritate human airways and can cause or exacerbate respiratory issues. Environmental activists have been encouraging people to switch to electric stoves, and cut climate pollution.
Why gas stoves are harmful
Initial studies done between 1999-2004 by The Lancet Respiratory Medicine found no evidence of an association between the use of gas as a cooking fuel and either asthma symptoms or asthma diagnosis.However, in the last few years, several studies have concluded that gas cooking increases the risk of asthma in children. A 2023 Meta analysis estimated that one in eight cases of asthma in children are due to pollution from gas stoves. Some of the major emissions from gas stoves, including carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, benzene, and nitrogen dioxide, not only contribute to indoor pollution but also exacerbate respiratory illness, such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
According to medical experts, the reddish-brown gas, nitrogen dioxide NO2, is the biggest concern and a key element of smog outdoors. This could irritate airways and contribute to asthma. Additionally, the methane and benzene released from gas stoves, even when they are off, are linked to cancer. Even if the gas stove manufacturers have developed cleaner and safer burners, they aren’t consumer friendly and are also not widely available to consumers.
A study done in 2023 revealed that cooking on a gas stove can emit significantly more harmful nanoparticles into the air, even when you compare them to the emission of gas-powered diesel vehicles.These emissions impact adults and children, potentially inhaling 10 to 100 times more nanocluster aerosols from indoor gas cooking compared to car exhaust fumes on a road.
In addition, gas stoves can lead to health risks within the home if there’s poor ventilation. A study done by Harvard revealed that the volatile organic chemicals that natural gas contains is more likely to leak into groundwater and migrate to drinking water supply wells. Another study that came after a few months of Harvard's research stated similar facts like those in the past – gas stoves are associated with higher risk of asthma in children Due to the small amounts of nitrogen dioxide and other pollutants which, if there's no proper ventilation, will hover in the home and can lead to severe asthma.
Although most of us may consider our exhaust fans to be effective in pushing those particles out of the home, according to a research by a Stanford University professor, these fans merely recycle air through a filter, which does not eliminate nitrogen oxide.
Are stove hoods safe?
The ultra-nanoparticles, measured about 1-3 nanometers in diameter, are invisible and small enough to bypass the body’s natural defenses and enter deep into the respiratory system and other organs. Thus, they increase the risk of developing asthma and other respiratory ailments. The research states that cooking on a gas stove can emit up to 10 quadrillion nanocluster aerosol particles per kilogram of cooking fuel, which is similar or even higher emission from vehicles with internal combustion engines. This includes any diesel or petrol run car or train, unless we go back to the 1700 century when steam engines were around.
Some studies in the past have also measured NO2 concentrations in various indoor settings.The results showed that people with asthma have more severe symptoms when they are exposed to higher levels of the gas. A study published by a public health researcher Dr Carl Shy noted that “families exposed to greater levels of theair pollutant nitrogen dioxide outdoors had higher rates of respiratory illness than families in less-polluted areas.” The researcher himself later informed health organizations that gas stoves produce nitrogen dioxide because of their high temperature and the range hoods can not clear the pollution.
Later, the gas industry argued that it is rather the opposite and said “range hoods could clear up this pollution.” According to an NPR study, with growing concerns of health effects from gas stoves, the gas industry started using a playbook similar to the one that tobacco companies used for decades.
Claims of tobacco-tactics used in gas stove
Several researches done in the United States show that gas companies back in the 1950s were employing people who had experience in the tobacco industry. Some of the researchers also stated that the American Gas Association was even hiring researchers who had previously accepted research funding from tobacco companies.Ralph Mitchell of Battelle Laboratories, who had conducted work for the tobacco industry,concluded that there were no health problems linked to use of a gas stove. Another research also reported that “no significant difference in reported respiratory illness between the members of households cooking with gas and those cooking with electricity.”
According to the NPR findings, all these years, the gas companies were funding the research related to the gas stove and its effects on health and climate. Their conclusion states that the findings were tempered since the researchers were highly funded. However, nearly 25 years later, the outdoor nitrogen dioxide standard was triggered in 2010, with the promise that it “will improve the air quality of millions.”