The 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) which has kicked off today and will continue till February 29 at Abu Dhabi is very critical for India as it will aggressively push to secure a permanent solution for its public stockholding programmes of foodgrains, the core of country’s food procurement to ensure food security. ETV Bharat explains:
What is public stockholding of food?
According to the WTO, public stockholding programmes are used by some governments to purchase, stockpile and distribute food to people in need. While food security is a legitimate policy objective, some stockholding programmes are considered to distort trade when they involve purchases from farmers at prices fixed by the governments, known as “administered” prices, which in the Indian context is the minimum support price (MSP) that the government decides for various Kharif and Rabi crops.
The “interim” peace clause
At the Bali Ministerial Conference held in 2013 it was agreed upon on an interim basis, public stockholding programmes in developing countries would not be challenged legally even if a country’s agreed limits for trade-distorting domestic support were breached. They also agreed to negotiate a permanent solution to this issue. India was then able to successfully argue that subsidy beyond the ceiling was essential on public stockholding of foodgrains as it was procured by the state at prices meant to support Indian farmers. It was also accepted that such public stockholding programmes ensure food security for 80 crore people.
The concession translated into what was described as the “peace clause. The so-called peace clause has not, however, been made a permanent provision at subsequent WTO meetings. Instead, it has been extended on a temporary basis at every subsequent ministerial conference.
Why is India pressing for a permanent solution?
The challenge for India is to make this into a permanent facility, given the need of emerging economies to provide farm subsidies to support agricultural growth and food security. Without such a permanent solution, India faces the prospect of disputes being raised at WTO over breach of subsidy limits.
India wants to seek a permanent solution on public stockholding with more enhanced terms, compared to the 2013 Bali peace clause.