New Delhi: He has judgments such as the Ayodhya land dispute, the abrogation of Article 370 and the decriminalisation of consensual gay sex that shaped society and politics to his name.
India’s 50th Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, known also for his many pithy statements, leaves an imprint all his own on the annals of legal history.
Friday was the last day in court for Chandrachud, or DYC as he is often referred to, capping a long career as a lawyer, Supreme Court judge and head of the country’s judiciary. The ever-articulate Chandrachud, who actually demitted office on Sunday, penned more than 500 judgments, some panned and many praised.
The Chandrachud legacy has a physical manifestation too - a reimagined ‘Lady Justice’. The earlier ‘Goddess of Justice’ in Grecian robes with blindfolds and swords has been replaced by a six-ft tall sculpture with scales in one hand and the Constitution in another. She is in a sari, with a crown and sans blindfold.
While that created a stir so did the decision on his penultimate day at work with the Supreme Court rechristening its summer vacation "partial court working days", an issue that has led to criticism that the apex court judges enjoyed long breaks.
DYC followed in the footsteps of his father Y V Chandrachud, who served as the CJI with the longest tenure between 1978 and 1985, the only instance of a father and son occupying the highest seat in the highest court of India.
The son, who studied in Delhi’s St Stephen’s College and Campus Law Centre and then went on to get an LLM degree and a doctorate from the Harvard Law School, became chief justice on November 9, 2022.
The list of judgments penned by him is long and covers almost all aspects of law. They blend scholarship and jurisprudence and are likely to inform both future decisions and how the law is studied.
The verdicts have included establishing the judiciary’s commitment to protecting individual rights and advancing justice, expanding the scope of fundamental rights to include privacy and invalidating the electoral bond scheme.
He was part of a landmark judgment by a five-judge constitution bench that recognised the 'living will' made by terminally ill patients for passive euthanasia.
The formidable Chandrachud was also part of several Constitution benches and wrote landmark verdicts, including the contentious Ayodhya land title dispute.
He was the author of the unanimous 2019 verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute which settled the fractious issue going back more than a century and paved the way for the construction of the temple. Ranjan Gogoi was chief justice at the time and heading the five-judge bench.
In his last days in office, the CJI stirred another controversy when he said in a public function that he prayed to the “deity” for a solution to the polarising dispute. The comment was reproduced widely and elicited sharp reactions from various quarters, including politicians and activists, Chandrachud, who also attracted attention when Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended a widely publicised Ganesh puja at his home, was the author of the lead judgment that unanimously upheld the 2019 revocation of Article 370 that gave special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.
Besides, he was on the bench that delivered path-breaking judgments on decriminalising same-sex relations and partially struck down Section 377 of the IPC on so-called unnatural sex (carnal intercourse against the order of nature).
However, the long-pending issue of granting legal sanction to same-sex marriage went against the LGBTQIA++ community and a five-judge bench headed by Chandrachud refused to accord legal recognition to it.