ETV Bharat / science-and-technology

'AI cannot be an inventor, its a machine not a person': UK Supreme Court

A U.S. computer scientist on Wednesday lost his bid to register patents over inventions created by his artificial intelligence system in a landmark case in Britain about whether AI can own patent rights.

A U.S. computer scientist on Wednesday lost his bid to register patents over inventions created by his artificial intelligence system in a landmark case in Britain about whether AI can own patent rights.
FILE - A man enters the Supreme Court in London, on Oct. 9, 2023. An artificial intelligence system can't be registered as the inventor of a patent, Britain's Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday Dec. 20, 2023 in a decision denying machines the same status as humans. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung, File)
author img

By AP (Associated Press)

Published : Dec 21, 2023, 11:54 AM IST

London: The UK Supreme Court has ruled that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be legally named as an inventor to secure patent rights.

An artificial intelligence system can't be registered as the inventor of a patent, Britain's Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in a decision that denies machines the same status as humans.

The U.K.'s highest court concluded that “an inventor must be a person” to apply for patents under the current law. The decision was the culmination of American technologist Stephen Thaler's long-running British legal battle to get his AI, dubbed DABUS, listed as the inventor of two patents.

Thaler claims DABUS autonomously created a food and drink container and a light beacon and that he’s entitled to rights over its inventions. Tribunals in the U.S. and the European Union have rejected similar applications by Thaler.

The U.K. Intellectual Property Office rejected Thaler's application in 2019, saying it's unable to officially register DABUS as the inventor because it’s not a person. After lower courts sided with the patent office, Thaler took his appeal to the Supreme Court, where a panel of judges unanimously dismissed the case.

The judges said DABUS is “not a person, let alone a natural person and it did not devise any relevant invention.”

Legal experts said the case shows how Britain's laws haven't kept up with technology and that policies should be updated given the breathtaking recent developments made by artificial intelligence, underscored by generative AI systems like OpenAI's ChatGPT that can rapidly spew out new poems, songs and computer code.

“As AI systems continue to advance in sophistication and capability, there is no denying their ability to generate new and non-obvious products and processes with minimal, or perhaps even without any, ongoing human input,” said Nick White, a partner at law firm Charles Russell Speechlys.

"Change may be on the horizon, but it will most likely come from the policymakers, rather than the judges,” he said.

Read More

  1. Year-ender 2023: Rise and rise of AI; what future holds for us
  2. Abuse in the machine: Study shows AI image-generators being trained on explicit photos of children
  3. Uttar Pradesh: Man duped by AI cloned voice, loses over Rs 1.5 lakh in extortion
  4. OpenAI outlines Artificial Intelligence safety plan, gives board veto power on risky AI

London: The UK Supreme Court has ruled that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be legally named as an inventor to secure patent rights.

An artificial intelligence system can't be registered as the inventor of a patent, Britain's Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in a decision that denies machines the same status as humans.

The U.K.'s highest court concluded that “an inventor must be a person” to apply for patents under the current law. The decision was the culmination of American technologist Stephen Thaler's long-running British legal battle to get his AI, dubbed DABUS, listed as the inventor of two patents.

Thaler claims DABUS autonomously created a food and drink container and a light beacon and that he’s entitled to rights over its inventions. Tribunals in the U.S. and the European Union have rejected similar applications by Thaler.

The U.K. Intellectual Property Office rejected Thaler's application in 2019, saying it's unable to officially register DABUS as the inventor because it’s not a person. After lower courts sided with the patent office, Thaler took his appeal to the Supreme Court, where a panel of judges unanimously dismissed the case.

The judges said DABUS is “not a person, let alone a natural person and it did not devise any relevant invention.”

Legal experts said the case shows how Britain's laws haven't kept up with technology and that policies should be updated given the breathtaking recent developments made by artificial intelligence, underscored by generative AI systems like OpenAI's ChatGPT that can rapidly spew out new poems, songs and computer code.

“As AI systems continue to advance in sophistication and capability, there is no denying their ability to generate new and non-obvious products and processes with minimal, or perhaps even without any, ongoing human input,” said Nick White, a partner at law firm Charles Russell Speechlys.

"Change may be on the horizon, but it will most likely come from the policymakers, rather than the judges,” he said.

Read More

  1. Year-ender 2023: Rise and rise of AI; what future holds for us
  2. Abuse in the machine: Study shows AI image-generators being trained on explicit photos of children
  3. Uttar Pradesh: Man duped by AI cloned voice, loses over Rs 1.5 lakh in extortion
  4. OpenAI outlines Artificial Intelligence safety plan, gives board veto power on risky AI
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.