ETV Bharat / state

Supreme Court seeks Centre's reply on Tamil Nadu's plea alleging governor RN Ravi delaying assent to bills

author img

By ETV Bharat English Team

Published : Nov 10, 2023, 1:40 PM IST

Updated : Nov 10, 2023, 2:41 PM IST

The Supreme Court sought to know the Centre's response to the Tamil Nadu government's plea alleging delay by the governor in giving assent to bills passed by the State Assembly. A bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra ordered notice to the Centre and sought the assistance of the Attorney General or Solicitor General in the matter, posting the matter to Nov. 20 for further hearing. Appearing for the Tamil Nadu government, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, submitted that 12 bills were passed by the Assembly and were pending with the office of the Governor RN Ravi.

The top court sought to know the Centre's response on the Tamil Nadu government's plea accusing the governor of delaying assent to bills passed by the State Assembly. A bench of comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra ordered notice to the Centre besides seeking the assistance of the Attorney General or Solicitor General in the matter and posting the matter for further hearing on Nov. 20.
Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi addressing a seminar on “G20 Leaders Delhi Declaration and Emerging World Order – India’s Cutting-edge Energy Technologies on Clean Energy" at Alagappa University, Karaikudi, last week.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday expressed concern that the Tamil Nadu governor has not acted upon 12 Bills, 54 proposals of premature release, 10 appointments in the public service commission and also proposals for sanctions for prosecution of public servants.

Senior advocates A M Singhvi, P Wilson, and Mukul Rohatgi, appeared for the Tamil Nadu government before the apex court. A bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, after hearing submissions from Tamil Nadu government counsel on pending bills and proposals, said “It is a matter of serious concern…”.

Singhvi submitted that 12 bills, passed between January 13, 2020 and April 28, 2023, are pending for the assent of the governor. The apex court was informed that among other categories of pending matters there are 54 files related to premature release of life terms.

The state government counsel contended that out of 14 posts of the TN Public Service Commission, 10 posts are lying vacant due to absence of governor's nod. The counsel further argued that some proposals for sanctions for prosecution have also been not acceded to. The state government counsel stressed on Article 200 of the Constitution which stated the governor has to take the decision on pending Bills "as soon as possible".

After hearing submissions, the bench, also comprising justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, issued notice to Centre on a plea filed by the Tamil Nadu government and scheduled the matter for further hearing on November 20. The bench also sought assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani or Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in the matter.

The Tamil Nadu government moved the Supreme Court against delay by governor RN Ravi in assenting bills passed by the state legislature saying it has brought the entire administration to a grinding halt and claimed that he has positioned himself as a “political rival” to the legitimately elected government.

The state’s plea contended that the governor by not “signing remission orders, day to day files, appointment orders, approving recruitment orders, granting approval to prosecute ministers, MLAs involved in corruption including transfer of investigation to CBI by Supreme Court, bills passed by Tamil Nadu legislative assembly” is bringing the entire administration to a grinding halt and creating adversarial attitude by not cooperating with the state administration.

The plea said the governor “has positioned himself as a political rival to the legitimately elected government by hindering and obstructing the legislative assembly's ability to carry out its legislative duties by unjustly and excessively delaying the consideration of bills that the assembly has passed”.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday expressed concern that the Tamil Nadu governor has not acted upon 12 Bills, 54 proposals of premature release, 10 appointments in the public service commission and also proposals for sanctions for prosecution of public servants.

Senior advocates A M Singhvi, P Wilson, and Mukul Rohatgi, appeared for the Tamil Nadu government before the apex court. A bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, after hearing submissions from Tamil Nadu government counsel on pending bills and proposals, said “It is a matter of serious concern…”.

Singhvi submitted that 12 bills, passed between January 13, 2020 and April 28, 2023, are pending for the assent of the governor. The apex court was informed that among other categories of pending matters there are 54 files related to premature release of life terms.

The state government counsel contended that out of 14 posts of the TN Public Service Commission, 10 posts are lying vacant due to absence of governor's nod. The counsel further argued that some proposals for sanctions for prosecution have also been not acceded to. The state government counsel stressed on Article 200 of the Constitution which stated the governor has to take the decision on pending Bills "as soon as possible".

After hearing submissions, the bench, also comprising justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, issued notice to Centre on a plea filed by the Tamil Nadu government and scheduled the matter for further hearing on November 20. The bench also sought assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani or Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in the matter.

The Tamil Nadu government moved the Supreme Court against delay by governor RN Ravi in assenting bills passed by the state legislature saying it has brought the entire administration to a grinding halt and claimed that he has positioned himself as a “political rival” to the legitimately elected government.

The state’s plea contended that the governor by not “signing remission orders, day to day files, appointment orders, approving recruitment orders, granting approval to prosecute ministers, MLAs involved in corruption including transfer of investigation to CBI by Supreme Court, bills passed by Tamil Nadu legislative assembly” is bringing the entire administration to a grinding halt and creating adversarial attitude by not cooperating with the state administration.

The plea said the governor “has positioned himself as a political rival to the legitimately elected government by hindering and obstructing the legislative assembly's ability to carry out its legislative duties by unjustly and excessively delaying the consideration of bills that the assembly has passed”.

Last Updated : Nov 10, 2023, 2:41 PM IST

TAGGED:

ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.