ETV Bharat / state

Madras HC concludes hearing on Vedanta plea challenging closure of Sterlite plant

Madras High Court concluded hearing on Vedanta plea challenging closure of its copper smelter unit in Thootukudi in Tamil Nadu in May 2018. Concluding the hearing of arguments after 39 days, a special bench of Justices TS Sivagnanam and V Bhavani Subbarayan said on Wednesday it would try to deliver the order as expeditiously as possible.

HC concludes hearing on Vedanta plea challenging closure of Sterlite plant
HC concludes hearing on Vedanta plea challenging closure of Sterlite plant
author img

By

Published : Jan 9, 2020, 3:18 PM IST

Chennai: The Madras High Court has reserved orders on a petition moved by mining major Vedanta Limited challenging the closure of its copper smelter unit in Thootukudi in Tamil Nadu in May 2018.

Concluding the hearing of arguments after 39 days, a special bench of Justices TS Sivagnanam and V Bhavani Subbarayan said on Wednesday it would try to deliver the order as expeditiously as possible.

Vedanta had approached the high court on in February last year seeking to reopen the Sterlite plant which was closed following a May 23, 2018 order issued by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) in the backdrop of violent protests against the unit that left 13 people dead in police firing on May 21 and 22.

Vedanta had moved the plea as suggested by the Supreme Court.

The top court had on February 18, 2019, set aside the National Green Tribunal order that allowed the opening of the Sterlite Plant, which was at the centre of massive protests over pollution concerns.

It, however, gave the liberty to the company to approach the high court against the closure orders of the Tamil Nadu government and its state pollution control board.

Read: IIT-M alumni donates Rs 1 cr to set up robotics research- teaching lab

An interim relief sought by Vedanta to permit access to the 200-acre factory premises to carry out maintenance work was rejected by the high court based on the assurance provided by the state that it would take responsibility of the premises.

The state government and TNPCB represented by the Advocate General Vijay Narayan and senior counsel CS Vaidyanathan opposed the plea for reopening of the plant, terming Sterlite as a 'chronic' defaulter.

"Unrestrained pollution appears to be standard modus operandi of the company, as it has been found guilty of various violations globally," they had contended.

Vedanta's senior counsels Aryama Sundaram and PS Raman countered the arguments, claiming that the closure order was nothing but 'naked discrimination' against the company.

The company also contended that the GO was only a knee-jerk reaction of the state to 'appease' a section of the public with vested interest after 13 protesters were killed in the police firing.

It also alleged the hand of a Chinese company behind its closure and claimed the company which has a financial interest in copper manufacturing was funding the protesters to agitate against Sterlite which is one of the biggest copper manufacturers with state-of-the-art technology.

Citing TNPCB pollution statistics, Vedanta claimed that a person living inside Sterlite is safer than a person living in Anna Nagar locality in Chennai.

Opposing the submissions, impleading petitioners in the plea Professor Fathima and Makkal Adhigaram told the court that the environment in Thoothukudi had actually improved after the closure of the plant.

Also Read: SC orders to keep sterlite plant of TN shut

Chennai: The Madras High Court has reserved orders on a petition moved by mining major Vedanta Limited challenging the closure of its copper smelter unit in Thootukudi in Tamil Nadu in May 2018.

Concluding the hearing of arguments after 39 days, a special bench of Justices TS Sivagnanam and V Bhavani Subbarayan said on Wednesday it would try to deliver the order as expeditiously as possible.

Vedanta had approached the high court on in February last year seeking to reopen the Sterlite plant which was closed following a May 23, 2018 order issued by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) in the backdrop of violent protests against the unit that left 13 people dead in police firing on May 21 and 22.

Vedanta had moved the plea as suggested by the Supreme Court.

The top court had on February 18, 2019, set aside the National Green Tribunal order that allowed the opening of the Sterlite Plant, which was at the centre of massive protests over pollution concerns.

It, however, gave the liberty to the company to approach the high court against the closure orders of the Tamil Nadu government and its state pollution control board.

Read: IIT-M alumni donates Rs 1 cr to set up robotics research- teaching lab

An interim relief sought by Vedanta to permit access to the 200-acre factory premises to carry out maintenance work was rejected by the high court based on the assurance provided by the state that it would take responsibility of the premises.

The state government and TNPCB represented by the Advocate General Vijay Narayan and senior counsel CS Vaidyanathan opposed the plea for reopening of the plant, terming Sterlite as a 'chronic' defaulter.

"Unrestrained pollution appears to be standard modus operandi of the company, as it has been found guilty of various violations globally," they had contended.

Vedanta's senior counsels Aryama Sundaram and PS Raman countered the arguments, claiming that the closure order was nothing but 'naked discrimination' against the company.

The company also contended that the GO was only a knee-jerk reaction of the state to 'appease' a section of the public with vested interest after 13 protesters were killed in the police firing.

It also alleged the hand of a Chinese company behind its closure and claimed the company which has a financial interest in copper manufacturing was funding the protesters to agitate against Sterlite which is one of the biggest copper manufacturers with state-of-the-art technology.

Citing TNPCB pollution statistics, Vedanta claimed that a person living inside Sterlite is safer than a person living in Anna Nagar locality in Chennai.

Opposing the submissions, impleading petitioners in the plea Professor Fathima and Makkal Adhigaram told the court that the environment in Thoothukudi had actually improved after the closure of the plant.

Also Read: SC orders to keep sterlite plant of TN shut

ZCZC
PRI GEN LGL NAT
.CHENNAI LGM1
TN-HC-STERLITE
HC concludes hearing on Vedanta plea challenging closure of
Sterlite plant
         Chennai, Jan 9 (PTI): The Madras High Court has
reserved orders on a petition moved by mining major Vedanta
Limited challenging the closure of its copper smelter unit in
Thootukudi in Tamil Nadu in May 2018.
         Concluding the hearing of arguments after 39 days, a
special bench of Justices TS Sivagnanam and V Bhavani
Subbaroyan said on Wednesday it would try to deliver the order
as expeditiously as possible.
         Vedanta had approached the high court on in February
last year seeking to reopen the Sterlite plant which was
closed following a May 23, 2018 order issued by the Tamil Nadu
Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) in the backdrop of violent
protests against the unit that left 13 people dead in police
firing on May 21 and 22.
         Vedanta had moved the plea as suggested by the Supreme
Court.
         The top court had on February 18, 2019, set aside the
National Green Tribunal order that allowed opening of the
Sterlite Plant, which was at the centre of massive protests
over pollution concerns.
         It, however, gave the liberty to the company to
approach the high court against the closure orders of the
Tamil Nadu government and its state pollution control board.
         An interim relief sought by Vedanta to permit access
to the 200-acre factory premises to carry out maintenance work
was rejected by the high court based on the assurance provided
by the state that it would take responsibility of the
premises.
         The state government and TNPCB represented by the
Advocate General Vijay Narayan and senior counsel CS
Vaidyanathan opposed the plea for reopening of the plant,
terming Sterlite as a 'chronic' defaulter.
         "Unrestrained pollution appears to be standard modus
operandi of the company, as it has been found guilty of
various violations globally," they had contended.
         Vedanta's senior counsels Aryama Sundaram and PS Raman
countered the arguments, claiming that the closure order was
nothing but 'naked discrimination' against the company.
         The company also contended that the GO was only a
knee-jerk reaction of the state to 'appease' a section of
public with vested interest after 13 protesters were killed in
the police firing.
         It also alleged the hand of a Chinese company behind
its closure and claimed the company which has financial
interest in copper manufacturing was funding the protesters to
agitate against Sterlite which is one of the biggest copper
manufacturers with state-of-the-art technology.
         Citing TNPCB pollution statistics, Vedanta claimed
that a person living inside Sterlite is safer than a person
living in Anna Nagar locality in Chennai.
         Opposing the submissions, impleading petitioners in
the plea Professor Fathima and Makkal Adhigaram told the court
that the environment in Thoothukudi had actually improved
after the closure of the plant. PTI COR
SS
SS
01091225
NNNN
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.