Srinagar (J&K): Jammu and Kashmir police has on Saturday clarified that it is aware of the difference between wilful harbouring of militants and the one done under stress. Earlier, police had claimed that it will attach properties of people who will provide shelter to militants or their associates under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
On Saturday, issuing fresh statement police said that there has been “misinformation” regarding the information provided by Srinagar Police with respect to the initiation of attachment of properties used for purpose of “terrorism.”
“The attachments being done are for properties where it has been proved beyond doubt that the house owner, member had wilfully provided shelter, harboured terrorists, in most cases for days together and that it was not done under any duress whatsoever,” a police spokesperson said. The attachment proceedings will come after investigation procedures, in any case, are at an “advanced” stage, the spokesman added.
Srinagar Police has also urged people not to pay heed to “misinformation” regarding the decision, however, reiterated not to provide shelter or harbour terrorists in their homes or immovable properties failing which strict action will be taken against them.
Also read: ED raids 11 locations in J&K in fake gun licences' scam
Over 200 encounters have been carried out in Kashmir during the past two years, a majority of which have occurred in residential houses or other properties. In most of these cases, the families have lost their homes to the gunfights leaving behind only rubble and debris. Even as many have been able to reconstruct their homes, some continue to struggle with shelter.
The police earlier on Thursday issued a statement stating that they have initiated the process for the attachment of some immovable properties which, they claimed, have been used for purpose of militancy as per section 2(g) and 25 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. The J&K Police in its latest statement, however, said that the decision is being misused by many to spread misinformation.
“Out of ignorance, some persons are trying to portray it as some kind of forced enforcement but it is a fact that Sections 2(g) and 25 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 have been in vogue for decades and these are not some recent additions as claimed by some rumour mongers,” the police said.
“The decision regarding enforcement of these sections of law is due to the fact that many supporters of terrorism are wilfully providing harbour and safe havens to terrorists who conduct attacks on civilians and security forces in Srinagar City,” the statement read.
Also read: CBI to probe ex-J&K Guv Satya Pal Malik's Rs 300 Cr bribe allegation
If a militant enters any house or other structure forcefully, the house owner or any other member claiming duress should timely inform the authorities, the police asserts.
“As many provisions for hiding identity of such informant are available under law. The onus always lies on the house owner/member to prove duress by informing the authorities well in time that there is/was forceful entry of terrorists into his/her house,” the police said.
