ETV Bharat / state

SC dismisses plea alleging 'mass cheating' by LIC

author img

By

Published : Jul 15, 2019, 10:47 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to accept the MoneyLife Foundation's plea alleging that the LIC has misled and cheated consumers through its Jeevan Saral policy.

Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition filed by a non-profit organisation alleging mass cheating by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) through its Jeevan Saral policy.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Deepak Gupta was hearing a plea filed by MoneyLife Foundation alleging that the Jeevan Saral Policyholders have been "misled and cheated" by LIC.

The bench also said the matter cannot be dealt with a PIL under Article 32 of the Constitution at the instance of a non-government organisation (NGO). The NGO failed to prove its locus standi in the court.

The petition submitted that several persons beyond 50 years, who were induced to take the policy as a good investment, ended up getting less than half the money -- deposited by way of premiums at the time -- when the policy matured.

The petitioner has sought immediate recollection of the policy, and direction to LIC and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) to “amend Jeevan Saral Plan 165 policy maturity to repay all the premium paid along with bank savings rate at 8% per annum to all the existing Policyholders of the Jeevan Saral Policy."

Also read: Nigerian national held from Palghar for hacking email accounts

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition filed by a non-profit organisation alleging mass cheating by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) through its Jeevan Saral policy.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Deepak Gupta was hearing a plea filed by MoneyLife Foundation alleging that the Jeevan Saral Policyholders have been "misled and cheated" by LIC.

The bench also said the matter cannot be dealt with a PIL under Article 32 of the Constitution at the instance of a non-government organisation (NGO). The NGO failed to prove its locus standi in the court.

The petition submitted that several persons beyond 50 years, who were induced to take the policy as a good investment, ended up getting less than half the money -- deposited by way of premiums at the time -- when the policy matured.

The petitioner has sought immediate recollection of the policy, and direction to LIC and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) to “amend Jeevan Saral Plan 165 policy maturity to repay all the premium paid along with bank savings rate at 8% per annum to all the existing Policyholders of the Jeevan Saral Policy."

Also read: Nigerian national held from Palghar for hacking email accounts

Intro:The Supreme Court today dismissed the plea filed by the non profit organisation Money Life Foundation plea which alleged that LIC through its Jeevan Saral Policy had rampantly mis sold with the claim that it would offer excellent returns, while in fact, ordered policy holders stand to lose a big chunk of the principle invested over 10 years.


Body:CJI led bench observed that the matter could not be dealt with in a PIL under Article 32 at the instance of NGO. It also said," We do not see how persons who are not interested can be part of the PIL. We however grant the petitioners the liberty to approach the appropriate authority."

"We are looking at a larger issue and not at an individual issue. For individual issue one can go to the consumer forum",said Mehta, the ASG appearing for LIC.

Arvind Datar, appearing for one of the petitioners submitted that LIC asks them to go to the IRDA and IRDA tells to go the parliament. He questioned,"How is the matter going to be resolved?"

The petition claimed that around 5 crore policy holders had suffered losses.The PIL sought the return of premium along with 8% interest.


Conclusion:
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.