New Delhi: Officers sitting over untapped potential to make COVID-19 vaccines need to be charged with “manslaughter” as it is leading to so many deaths, the Delhi High Court said on Wednesday, observing that a lot of scope and infrastructure is available in India which is not being used.
The court said some urgent hand-holding is required for manufacturing vaccines which is missing because of 'fear psychosis' and this potential should not be taken away by foreigners.
“The problem is of fear psychosis that some vigilance enquiry will take place, audit will take place, police investigation will take place. Tell them, this is not the time to be wary of these investigations and audit reports. This is leading to deaths today. Actually some people need to be charged with manslaughter for sitting over this untapped potential,” a bench of Justices Manmohan and Najmi Waziri said.
The court said the Centre should expedite the process of clearing samples of Panacea Biotec which has collaborated with Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) for manufacturing Sputnik V here.
If the vaccine has been approved for administering to the public at large, then the government is only required to see that the samples being produced by this firm are in conformity with the existing standards, it added.
Read: Court issues notice on vaccination of children
“Why you want them to go through a bridge trial, if you have made the bridge trial for the imported vaccine.
“The bridge trial should have been conducted even with regard to the imported vaccine. You have done away with it for the imported vaccine. Why insist it for the domestic manufacturer but not for the manufacturer abroad,” the bench asked.
Additional Solicitor General Balbir Singh, representing the Centre, said Panacea is far from producing the COVID-19 vaccine as it is pending approval from the authority and added that it cannot say the firm lacks funds for the manufacture of the vaccine as it was already getting finances from the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF).
He said the issues of procuring and manufacturing of the vaccine including Sputnik are pending before the Supreme Court and therefore this court should not pass any order in the present application.
He said the firm is one month away from commercial production of the vaccine and efficiency test has to be complied with as there is no waiver under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.
The high court was hearing a plea of Delhi-based Panacea Biotec which has sought the release of an arbitral award, passed earlier in its favour and against the Centre, saying it needs funds at the earliest in the larger interest of humanity as it has already manufactured trial batches of COVID vaccine Sputnik V in collaboration with RDIF and the process of manufacturing scale-up batches is on.
Read: HC questions Juhi Chawla for raising 5G issue in court without approaching government
The bench said: “There is a lot of scope and infrastructure for manufacture of vaccine in India which is going untapped and this is a factor you (Centre) must consider. See this untapped potential has to be utilised. You can’t leave this potential untapped. Foreigners are coming here, they should not take away this untapped potential. Your officers are not realizing this.” It added, “Himachal has a population of 75 lakh, Rajasthan has eight crore, Punjab has three crore. All these can be done by some manufacturer in north India. Half of the country can be fed by this only. There is a real urgency.” The bench said what about those who have lost their lives because of lack of vaccination and asked the Centre to act fast.
“There is a tearing hurry, it’s a tearing emergency. You expedite your decision so that there is ‘some rahat ki saans' (sigh of relief)” the bench said.
The court questioned the Centre saying it was not conducting efficacy test for a drug which is imported in India but was following the rule for the same drug being produced here.
“What does that mean. You are just sitting by the rule book. When the rule book says that in emergent circumstances you can do that. An entire State could have been vaccinated in no time. You need to move a little faster. We understand your point on safety, but this can be done very quickly,” it said, adding that these extraordinary circumstances and the officers dealing with these files need to be sensitised.
Read: No license for home delivery of liquor issued, clarifies Delhi govt
“Our concern is that there is such an element of palpable disquiet in the country. Everybody wants vaccine. We have to cut this short. And the rule itself empowers you to actually waive this (tests), if you in your wisdom like to waive. In the end they are identical products, one is imported and another manufactured here,” the bench said, and asked the ASG and central government standing counsel Rajesh Ranjan to come back with formal instruction in this.
The court after hearing submissions of the plea, listed it for June 4 for passing an order.
The court also asked the Centre’s counsel to take instructions on the issue that “suppose we pass an order that you only test these samples that have been given and if they are in conformity with the product that you have decided to use within India, then you should not have a problem releasing the money.” Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi, representing Panacea Biotec, has said it has only got an advance amount from RDIF and it needs further funds to ramp up its production which has to be 100 million (10 crore) doses per year.
He had earlier said the vaccine's veracity has been tested by the government to be good to be used and it does not require any other approval except that its manufactured samples should be identical to Dr Reddy’s product.
PTI
