ETV Bharat / science-and-technology

Elon Musk's X can't avoid content moderation law: US judge

In its judgement, US District Judge denied X(formerly Twitter) attempt to temporarily halt a California law that pushes social media platforms to disclose their strategies for moderating harmful content.

In its judgement, US District Judge denied X(formerly Twitter) attempt to temporarily halt a California law that pushes social media platforms to disclose their strategies for moderating harmful content.
Representative Image
author img

By ETV Bharat Tech Team

Published : Dec 30, 2023, 10:57 AM IST

Hyderabad/San Francisco: X, formerly Twitter, has lost its bid to block a California content moderation law on Friday. A judge in the US ruled that Elon Musk-run X cannot avoid a California law that asks social media platforms to disclose their plans for moderating harmful content and misinformation.

United States District Judge William Shubb has denied X's request for a preliminary injunction of the law and ruled the law’s reporting requirements should be considered corporate speech.

"The mere fact that the reports may be ‘tied in some way to a controversial issue’ does not make the reports themselves controversial,” Shubb wrote in his judgment. "While the reporting requirement does appear to place a substantial compliance burden on social media companies, it does not appear that the requirement is unjustified or unduly burdensome within the context of First Amendment law," Shubb added.

What is the law? The AB 587 law requires large social media companies to share descriptions of how they moderate content that contains hate speech or racism, extremism or radicalisation, disinformation, harassment, and foreign political interference.

X argument- In a complaint filed in September, X argued that the law violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The company claimed the California law violated its free speech rights by requiring it to publicly post its policies and report data on hate speech, disinformation, harassment, and extremism online.

X said that it’s “difficult to reliably define” what constitutes hate speech, misinformation, and political interference. The company also alleged that AB 587 would force social media platforms to " 'eliminate' certain constitutionally-protected content.

"California Governor Gavin Newsom last year signed a law aimed at making social media platforms monitor hate speech, extremism, harassment, and other objectionable behaviours.

AB 587 requires social media companies to post their terms of service online, as well as submit a twice-yearly report to the state attorney general, according to reports. (With IANS Inputs)

Read More

  1. Centre issues advisory to social media giants on AI-generated deep fakes
  2. European Union investigating Musk's X over possible breaches of social media law
  3. Elon Musk shares traffic versus revenue stats of X; compares it with Facebook and Instagram

Hyderabad/San Francisco: X, formerly Twitter, has lost its bid to block a California content moderation law on Friday. A judge in the US ruled that Elon Musk-run X cannot avoid a California law that asks social media platforms to disclose their plans for moderating harmful content and misinformation.

United States District Judge William Shubb has denied X's request for a preliminary injunction of the law and ruled the law’s reporting requirements should be considered corporate speech.

"The mere fact that the reports may be ‘tied in some way to a controversial issue’ does not make the reports themselves controversial,” Shubb wrote in his judgment. "While the reporting requirement does appear to place a substantial compliance burden on social media companies, it does not appear that the requirement is unjustified or unduly burdensome within the context of First Amendment law," Shubb added.

What is the law? The AB 587 law requires large social media companies to share descriptions of how they moderate content that contains hate speech or racism, extremism or radicalisation, disinformation, harassment, and foreign political interference.

X argument- In a complaint filed in September, X argued that the law violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The company claimed the California law violated its free speech rights by requiring it to publicly post its policies and report data on hate speech, disinformation, harassment, and extremism online.

X said that it’s “difficult to reliably define” what constitutes hate speech, misinformation, and political interference. The company also alleged that AB 587 would force social media platforms to " 'eliminate' certain constitutionally-protected content.

"California Governor Gavin Newsom last year signed a law aimed at making social media platforms monitor hate speech, extremism, harassment, and other objectionable behaviours.

AB 587 requires social media companies to post their terms of service online, as well as submit a twice-yearly report to the state attorney general, according to reports. (With IANS Inputs)

Read More

  1. Centre issues advisory to social media giants on AI-generated deep fakes
  2. European Union investigating Musk's X over possible breaches of social media law
  3. Elon Musk shares traffic versus revenue stats of X; compares it with Facebook and Instagram
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.