ETV Bharat / international

Trump committed 'impeachable offences'

After hearing from 12 witnesses in 35 hours of the public testimony, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee issued a report alleging that Trump abused the power of his office by pressuring Ukraine.

Witnesses Noah Feldman, Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Jonathan Turley
Witnesses Noah Feldman, Pamela Karlan, Michael Gerhardt, Jonathan Turley
author img

By

Published : Dec 5, 2019, 11:42 AM IST

Washington: During the much anticipated House Judiciary hearing in a matter about the impeachment of President Donald Trump, three out of four constitutional scholars told a key committee that the president committed impeachable offenses by pressuring Ukraine to take action against his political rivals.

However, the fourth legal expert demurred and said that the Democrats are moving too fast.

"Based on the testimony and the evidence presented to the House, President Trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by abusing the office of the presidency," a law professor at Harvard Law School Noah Feldman told the House Judiciary Committee.

"Specifically, President Trump has abused his office by corruptly soliciting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine to announce investigations of his political rivals to gain personal advantage including in the 2020 presidential election," Feldman said.

Read Also: Impeachment inquiry 'very hard on my family', says Trump

While the hearing was underway, Trump in London abruptly canceled a planned news conference at the NATO leadership conference.

The chairman of the judiciary committee Jerrold Nadler has expressed displeasure on the matter and said that it is the first time in the history of the US that a president appears to have solicited personal political favors from a foreign government.

"When we apply the Constitution to those facts, if it is true that Trump has committed an impeachable offense or multiple, repeated impeachable offenses then we must move swiftly to do our duty and move forward to charge him accordingly," Nadler said.

The Democrats initiated the investigation when a whistleblower revealed that Trump during a July 25 telephone call with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asked for a favor and wanted him to open an investigation against the former vice president and Democrats presidential candidate and son Hunter.

According to the information, Trump administration was withholding USD 391 million in congressionally mandated military and financial aid from Ukraine.

After hearing from 12 witnesses in 35 hours of the public testimony, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee issued a report on Tuesday alleging that Trump abused the power of his office by pressuring Ukraine.

"The evidence reveals a president who used the powers of his office to demand that a foreign government participate in undermining a competing candidate for the presidency," Pamela Karlan, a law professor at Stanford University Law School, told Wednesday's House Judiciary panel hearing.

"It shows a president who delayed meeting a foreign leader and providing assistance that Congress and his advisors agreed...," Karlan said.

Doug Collins, the top Republican on Judiciary Committee, lamented the panel's process saying Democrats were moving to impeach Trump for political reasons.

"We are here, no fact witnesses, simply a rubber stamp," Collins said.

Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University Law School, supported the Republican view in his testimony.

Read More: Trump's impeachment public hearings on Wednesday

While Trump's telephone call with Zelenskyy was anything but perfect, Turley said the Democrats' investigation so far had produced a wafer-thin body of evidence and their process was slipshod.

"This is not how you impeach an American president," Turley said.

Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina, compared the context and gravity of Trump's conduct to the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1973.

"The fact that we can easily transfer the Articles of Impeachment against President Nixon to the actions of this president speaks volumes. And that does not even include the most serious national security concerns and election interference on the part of this president," Gerhardt said.

"I cannot help but conclude that this president has attacked each of the Constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country," he said.

Read Also: Trump takes bold stance at NATO as impeachment boils at home

Washington: During the much anticipated House Judiciary hearing in a matter about the impeachment of President Donald Trump, three out of four constitutional scholars told a key committee that the president committed impeachable offenses by pressuring Ukraine to take action against his political rivals.

However, the fourth legal expert demurred and said that the Democrats are moving too fast.

"Based on the testimony and the evidence presented to the House, President Trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by abusing the office of the presidency," a law professor at Harvard Law School Noah Feldman told the House Judiciary Committee.

"Specifically, President Trump has abused his office by corruptly soliciting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine to announce investigations of his political rivals to gain personal advantage including in the 2020 presidential election," Feldman said.

Read Also: Impeachment inquiry 'very hard on my family', says Trump

While the hearing was underway, Trump in London abruptly canceled a planned news conference at the NATO leadership conference.

The chairman of the judiciary committee Jerrold Nadler has expressed displeasure on the matter and said that it is the first time in the history of the US that a president appears to have solicited personal political favors from a foreign government.

"When we apply the Constitution to those facts, if it is true that Trump has committed an impeachable offense or multiple, repeated impeachable offenses then we must move swiftly to do our duty and move forward to charge him accordingly," Nadler said.

The Democrats initiated the investigation when a whistleblower revealed that Trump during a July 25 telephone call with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asked for a favor and wanted him to open an investigation against the former vice president and Democrats presidential candidate and son Hunter.

According to the information, Trump administration was withholding USD 391 million in congressionally mandated military and financial aid from Ukraine.

After hearing from 12 witnesses in 35 hours of the public testimony, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee issued a report on Tuesday alleging that Trump abused the power of his office by pressuring Ukraine.

"The evidence reveals a president who used the powers of his office to demand that a foreign government participate in undermining a competing candidate for the presidency," Pamela Karlan, a law professor at Stanford University Law School, told Wednesday's House Judiciary panel hearing.

"It shows a president who delayed meeting a foreign leader and providing assistance that Congress and his advisors agreed...," Karlan said.

Doug Collins, the top Republican on Judiciary Committee, lamented the panel's process saying Democrats were moving to impeach Trump for political reasons.

"We are here, no fact witnesses, simply a rubber stamp," Collins said.

Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University Law School, supported the Republican view in his testimony.

Read More: Trump's impeachment public hearings on Wednesday

While Trump's telephone call with Zelenskyy was anything but perfect, Turley said the Democrats' investigation so far had produced a wafer-thin body of evidence and their process was slipshod.

"This is not how you impeach an American president," Turley said.

Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina, compared the context and gravity of Trump's conduct to the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1973.

"The fact that we can easily transfer the Articles of Impeachment against President Nixon to the actions of this president speaks volumes. And that does not even include the most serious national security concerns and election interference on the part of this president," Gerhardt said.

"I cannot help but conclude that this president has attacked each of the Constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country," he said.

Read Also: Trump takes bold stance at NATO as impeachment boils at home

Intro:Body:

intl 2


Conclusion:
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2025 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.