ETV Bharat / city

SC to examine Kanimozhi's plea challenging Madras HC order

DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi's plea against the Madras High Court's order on petitions challenging her 2019 election from Thoothukudi Lok Sabha Constituency will be examined by the Supreme Court.

Kanimozhi
Kanimozhi
author img

By

Published : Mar 17, 2021, 5:45 PM IST

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi's plea against the Madras High Court's order on petitions challenging her 2019 election from Thoothukudi Lok Sabha Constituency.

Also read: Parliamentary committee suggests MHA to implement Mahila Police Volunteer scheme

A bench led by the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde, initially asked as to why is she stifling the trial, it should be done. Meanwhile, Kanimozhi's advocate, P Wilson told the court that they are not against the trial, adding that out of the 38 respondents only 32 had been served.

Also read: AAP protests against more powers for Delhi governor

When the Court questioned why Kanimozhi didn't disclose the PAN of her spouse. Her lawyer argued before the court that her husband being a foreign citizen, doesn't hold a PAN card and that she has not suppressed any information.

Also read: Kejriwal accuses BJP of trying to 'curtail powers' of elected govt through Bill in LS

"We understand what you are saying, that's not a requirement at all. The only requirement is to disclose nationality. We will see that maybe holding an account may not have any effect on elections," the CJI said, adding that the matter will be heard again.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi's plea against the Madras High Court's order on petitions challenging her 2019 election from Thoothukudi Lok Sabha Constituency.

Also read: Parliamentary committee suggests MHA to implement Mahila Police Volunteer scheme

A bench led by the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde, initially asked as to why is she stifling the trial, it should be done. Meanwhile, Kanimozhi's advocate, P Wilson told the court that they are not against the trial, adding that out of the 38 respondents only 32 had been served.

Also read: AAP protests against more powers for Delhi governor

When the Court questioned why Kanimozhi didn't disclose the PAN of her spouse. Her lawyer argued before the court that her husband being a foreign citizen, doesn't hold a PAN card and that she has not suppressed any information.

Also read: Kejriwal accuses BJP of trying to 'curtail powers' of elected govt through Bill in LS

"We understand what you are saying, that's not a requirement at all. The only requirement is to disclose nationality. We will see that maybe holding an account may not have any effect on elections," the CJI said, adding that the matter will be heard again.

ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2025 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.