New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea to restrain the media from 'sensationalising' the trial of wrestler and two-time Olympic medallist Sushil Kumar in connection with the death of a 23-year old wrestler, and seeking rules for reporting criminal cases, saying a PIL cannot be filed for an individual who is a "vigilant person".
A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh said the petition has been filed on behalf of a "vigilant person" Sushil Kumar. Sushil claimed the media of defaming him by its reportage of the murder case in which he is the prime accused.
"You cannot file a PIL for an individual. We see no reason to entertain litigation on behalf of a vigilant person," the court said and disposed of the plea by a law student.
The law student had alleged that Kumar's career and reputation has been damaged by the media's reporting of the case against him in connection with the Chhatrasal Stadium brawl that led to the death of the 23-year-old wrestler.
Also read:Delhi High Court likely to hear today petition moved by Sushil Kumar's mother to stop media trial
On May 23, a Delhi court sent Kumar to 6-day police custody for interrogation in connection with the killing of a fellow wrestler, saying the allegations against him are serious in nature and that no one is above the law.
Kumar and his associates allegedly assaulted wrestler Sagar Dhankar (23) and two of his friends, Sonu and Amit Kumar, at the Chhatrasal Stadium, on the intervening night of May 4 and 5. Sagar succumbed to the injuries later.
Sushil fled the city, as soon as he got to know about the wrestler Sagar Rana's death following the Chhatrasal Stadium brawl on May 4.
Sushil Kumar, who was on the run for nearly three weeks, was arrested on May 23 from outer Delhi's Mundka area.
Also read: Slain wrestler's parents call for strict punishment
Allowing the police to interrogate Kumar for six days, the magistrate had said, "No one is above law and law treats everyone equally. Our Constitution guarantees the right to life and liberty to all persons subject to exceptions. The allegations against the accused persons are grave in nature."
Delhi Police has lodged an FIR in the case under sections 302 (murder), 308 (culpable homicide), 365 (kidnapping), 325 (causing grievous hurt), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 341 (wrongful restraint) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The FIR was also registered under sections 188 (disobedience to order by public servant), 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection of disease), 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 34 (common intention) of the IPC and various sections of the Arms Act.
(PTI)
