ETV Bharat / bharat

Yechury questions Yusuf Tarigami's detention, says no charges registered against him

Questioning the detention of CPI (M) leader Yusuf Tarigami, Sitaram Yechury said that no charges have been pressed against him. He also said that to keep people in such condition is a violation of human rights.

author img

By

Published : Oct 1, 2019, 11:56 PM IST

New Delhi: CPI (M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury on Tuesday questioned party leader Yusuf Tarigami's detention, asserting that no charges have been pressed against the latter.

"It is a matter of regret that the case has been postponed for another six weeks. It's been two months but there is no communication connectivity. If there is normalcy in Jammu and Kashmir then why Yusuf Tarigami is not allowed to go outside his home. There is no charge against him then why such restrictions? To keep people in such condition is not a violation of human rights?" he asked.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court asked the Centre to file a reply on the habeas corpus petition moved by Yechury for Tarigami.

Habeas corpus petition seeks a person under arrest to be brought before a court, especially to secure their release, unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention. During the course of proceedings, the apex court observed that with the production of Tarigami before the court last month, there is no urgency left in the matter.

"He himself came before this court (as Tarigami has filed a plea before the top court against abrogation of Article 370), where is he missing now?" said the court.

Raju Ramchandran, a counsel appearing for Yechury, challenged the validity of Tarigami's detention today, on which the court said that it would come up in due course. It suggested that the matter should be heard by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court.

"If we pass these orders it will be as if the High Court is not functioning. If you want it to be heard here, it will not be taken up immediately. Let it come in due course," the bench said.

The court had last month allowed Yechury to visit Jammu and Kashmir to meet ailing Tarigami and asked him to file an affidavit on his return. Taking cognizance of the affidavit, the court had also ordered Tarigami to be shifted to All Indian Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS).

Yechury filed the petition after the central government's diluted the provisions under Article 370, which led to the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmir's special constitutional status.

Following the decision, several political leaders including former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah, PDP president Mehbooba Mufti were taken into preventive custody.

Also Read: Have a look at swanky interiors of New Vande Bharat Express!

New Delhi: CPI (M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury on Tuesday questioned party leader Yusuf Tarigami's detention, asserting that no charges have been pressed against the latter.

"It is a matter of regret that the case has been postponed for another six weeks. It's been two months but there is no communication connectivity. If there is normalcy in Jammu and Kashmir then why Yusuf Tarigami is not allowed to go outside his home. There is no charge against him then why such restrictions? To keep people in such condition is not a violation of human rights?" he asked.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court asked the Centre to file a reply on the habeas corpus petition moved by Yechury for Tarigami.

Habeas corpus petition seeks a person under arrest to be brought before a court, especially to secure their release, unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention. During the course of proceedings, the apex court observed that with the production of Tarigami before the court last month, there is no urgency left in the matter.

"He himself came before this court (as Tarigami has filed a plea before the top court against abrogation of Article 370), where is he missing now?" said the court.

Raju Ramchandran, a counsel appearing for Yechury, challenged the validity of Tarigami's detention today, on which the court said that it would come up in due course. It suggested that the matter should be heard by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court.

"If we pass these orders it will be as if the High Court is not functioning. If you want it to be heard here, it will not be taken up immediately. Let it come in due course," the bench said.

The court had last month allowed Yechury to visit Jammu and Kashmir to meet ailing Tarigami and asked him to file an affidavit on his return. Taking cognizance of the affidavit, the court had also ordered Tarigami to be shifted to All Indian Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS).

Yechury filed the petition after the central government's diluted the provisions under Article 370, which led to the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmir's special constitutional status.

Following the decision, several political leaders including former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah, PDP president Mehbooba Mufti were taken into preventive custody.

Also Read: Have a look at swanky interiors of New Vande Bharat Express!

Intro:The Suprme Court today held the case made out for production of Maharashtra's Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis under Section 125 of Representation of People's Act for failing to disclose two cases against him on election affidavit. The Supreme court bench headed by the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi set aside the Bombay HC judgement and allows the trial to proceed.


Body:Advocate Satish Ukey had challenged the Bombay High Court verdict which had ruled in Maharashtra's CM favour.Ukey contended that Fadnavis had failed to disclose two criminal cases pending against him in 2014 when he had submitted his election affidavit.Ukey said that he did not disclose the information under the election law and was violating the Represenation of People's Act.

Fadnavis had contested the elections from south west Nagpur in Maharashtra and Ukey seeka to annul his elections.


Conclusion:(Byte attached is of Satish Ukey)
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2025 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.