ETV Bharat / bharat

SC verdict on Ayodhya likely to be in BJP favour, says political expert

The Supreme Court on Wednesday concluded hearing the Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya after a marathon 40 days of arguments and reserved the judgment. On the issue political expert, Sharad Gupta said that most probably the verdict will be in favor of BJP.

SC verdict on Ayodhya land dispute will be in favor of BJP, says political expert
author img

By

Published : Oct 21, 2019, 6:14 PM IST

New Delhi: The Ayodhya dispute has existed almost as long as independent India itself. The Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhumi dispute is a religious and political conflict. The groups of Hindu organization claim that mosque was built after demolishing the temple and also the site to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity i.e. Ram whereas Muslim claims that the mosque was never built after the demolition of the temples.

SC verdict on Ayodhya land dispute likely to be in BJP favour, says political expert

The legal battle between Hindus and Muslims in Ayodhya began in 1949 as a title dispute. By the 1980s, the case had shot to the center stage, riding a wave of identity politics. In the early 1990s, the dispute gained popular support and took the shape of a movement, which culminated in the demolition of the Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992.

The political leadership shifted the matter into the courts' realm. But the cases have been dragging for 25 years. In 2010, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court delivered a judgment, but the parties involved appealed against it in the Supreme Court.

On 6 December 1992, the VHP and the BJP organized a rally at the site involving 150,000 volunteers, known as kar sevaks. The rally turned violent, and the crowd overwhelmed security forces and tore down the mosque.

On this issue, the political expert Sharad Gupta said that by 1992 the country was divided into two parts, one was in support of Babri Masjid and the other was in favor of Ram Mandir. After the demolition of the Babri Masjid, there were major changes in the country's politics. The government of the then Chief Minister Kalyan Singh was dismissed. Along with this, three other BJP-led state governments were also dismissed in Madhya Pradesh, Himachal, and Rajasthan.

"Even in today's times, these communal issues are raised during the elections for the vote bank. If we look at the present times, all the anti-temple political parties in Uttar Pradesh are weakened. As per the country's situation, it can be said that the BJP will be benefited by the Supreme Court verdict," Sharad Gupta said.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday concluded hearing the Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya after a marathon 40 days of arguments and reserved the judgment.

Also Read: All Assam Students Union asks govt to ensure safety, security of people before any developmental project

New Delhi: The Ayodhya dispute has existed almost as long as independent India itself. The Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhumi dispute is a religious and political conflict. The groups of Hindu organization claim that mosque was built after demolishing the temple and also the site to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity i.e. Ram whereas Muslim claims that the mosque was never built after the demolition of the temples.

SC verdict on Ayodhya land dispute likely to be in BJP favour, says political expert

The legal battle between Hindus and Muslims in Ayodhya began in 1949 as a title dispute. By the 1980s, the case had shot to the center stage, riding a wave of identity politics. In the early 1990s, the dispute gained popular support and took the shape of a movement, which culminated in the demolition of the Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992.

The political leadership shifted the matter into the courts' realm. But the cases have been dragging for 25 years. In 2010, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court delivered a judgment, but the parties involved appealed against it in the Supreme Court.

On 6 December 1992, the VHP and the BJP organized a rally at the site involving 150,000 volunteers, known as kar sevaks. The rally turned violent, and the crowd overwhelmed security forces and tore down the mosque.

On this issue, the political expert Sharad Gupta said that by 1992 the country was divided into two parts, one was in support of Babri Masjid and the other was in favor of Ram Mandir. After the demolition of the Babri Masjid, there were major changes in the country's politics. The government of the then Chief Minister Kalyan Singh was dismissed. Along with this, three other BJP-led state governments were also dismissed in Madhya Pradesh, Himachal, and Rajasthan.

"Even in today's times, these communal issues are raised during the elections for the vote bank. If we look at the present times, all the anti-temple political parties in Uttar Pradesh are weakened. As per the country's situation, it can be said that the BJP will be benefited by the Supreme Court verdict," Sharad Gupta said.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday concluded hearing the Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya after a marathon 40 days of arguments and reserved the judgment.

Also Read: All Assam Students Union asks govt to ensure safety, security of people before any developmental project

Intro:नई दिल्ली: अयोध्या की ज़मीन ऐसे विवादों से भरी है जिनकी वजह से हिंदुस्तान की राजनीति में धर्म के लिये जगह पुख्ता की है। राजनीति में धर्म की वो पैठ बढ़ने के कारण आज भी मन्दिर मस्जिद का विवाद उसी मोड़ पर खड़ा है। हालांकि अयोध्या को लेकर भारत की राजनीति ने बहुत से उतार चढ़ाव देखे हैं।


Body:अयोध्या की गलियों में राम मन्दिर निर्माण का एक बड़ा हिमायती सियासत में भी मिल गया जिसका प्रमाण 1989 के चुनावों में देखने को मिला, जब दो की जगह 85 सीटें जीतकर बीजेपी ने वीपी सिंह की जनता दल के साथ सरकार बनाई।

6 दिसंबर 1992 के दिन अयोध्या पहुंचकर हजारों की संख्या में कारसेवकों ने बाबरी मस्जिद का विध्वंस कर दिया था जिसका नतीजा उस समय की भाजपा की सरकार को करना पड़ा था। इस मुद्दे पर बातचीत के दौरान राजनीतिक विशेषज्ञ शरद गुप्ता ने बताया, "1992 तक पूरा देश दो हिस्सों में बंट गया था, एक बाबरी मस्जिद के पक्ष में था और एक राम जन्मभूमि के पक्ष में था। बाबरी मस्जिद के गिरने के बाद देश की राजनीति में बहुत बड़े परिवर्तन हुए। उस समय के मुख्यमंत्री कल्याण सिंह की सरकार बर्खास्त की गई। पक्षी के साथ तीन और राज्यों की सरकारें भी बर्खास्त कर दी गई थी।"

आज के दौर में भी इस मामले को ले कर राजनीति में बड़े बड़े दाओं खेले जाते हैं। चुनावों के दौरान मतदाताओं की मानसिकता को भुनाने के लिये सांप्रदायिक मुद्दों को उठाया जाता है। शरद गुप्ता ने बताया, " पूरा देश इस समय राष्ट्रवाद की भावना से भरा हुआ है जिसका एक प्रतीक बाबरी मस्जिद है। आज के दौर को अगर देखा जाए तो उत्तर प्रदेश में जितने भी मंदिर विरोधी ताकतें हैं वह सब राजनीतिक दल कमज़ोर पड़ गए हैं।"


Conclusion:40 दिन की सुनवाई पूरी होने के बाद सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने अपना फैसला सुरक्षित रख लिया है जिसकी घोषणा नवंबर के महीने में हो सकती है। "आज के समय में चल रही राजनीतिक हवा को देखते हुए, सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले से भाजपा की सरकार को ही फायदा होने की उम्मीद है।"

For All Latest Updates

TAGGED:

Sharad Gupta
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.