ETV Bharat / bharat

SC dissolves marriage after couple failed to work it out for 22 years

The Supreme court, after 22 years of struggling to get a divorce and working out a marriage, gave a big relief to the husband ordering the dissolution of marriage.

SC dissolves marriage after couple failed to work it out for 22 years
author img

By

Published : Oct 10, 2019, 4:50 PM IST

New Delhi: After 22 years of struggling to get a divorce and working out a marriage, the Supreme Court gave a big relief to the husband ordering dissolution of marriage terming it 'unworkable, emotionally dead, beyond salvage and broken down irreversibly.'

SC dissolves marriage after couple failed to work it out for 22 years

The bench comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MR Shah observed that though the interest of the wife had to be kept by providing permanent alimony, it was a fit case for the dissolution of marriage. The court has directed the husband to pay Rs20 lakh alimony within 8 weeks.

The court said, "If both parties to the marriage agree for separation permanently, in that case, certainly both the parties can move the competent court. Only in the case where one of the parties do not agree and give consent, only then the powers under Article 142 of the constitution of India are required to be invoked to do substantial justice between the parties, considering the facts and circumstances of the case."

In 2012, the husband had filed an appeal against the Andhra Pradesh High court judgment which upheld the family court's decision of refusing divorce.

The former couple got married in 1993 but after the differences arose between them, the wife stayed with her parents for most of the time till 1997. The husband alleged that cruelty was met out to him and filed an appeal for divorce in 1997 before a family court in Hyderabad.

Also read:Maha: Woman delivers baby in one-rupee clinic at Thane station

New Delhi: After 22 years of struggling to get a divorce and working out a marriage, the Supreme Court gave a big relief to the husband ordering dissolution of marriage terming it 'unworkable, emotionally dead, beyond salvage and broken down irreversibly.'

SC dissolves marriage after couple failed to work it out for 22 years

The bench comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MR Shah observed that though the interest of the wife had to be kept by providing permanent alimony, it was a fit case for the dissolution of marriage. The court has directed the husband to pay Rs20 lakh alimony within 8 weeks.

The court said, "If both parties to the marriage agree for separation permanently, in that case, certainly both the parties can move the competent court. Only in the case where one of the parties do not agree and give consent, only then the powers under Article 142 of the constitution of India are required to be invoked to do substantial justice between the parties, considering the facts and circumstances of the case."

In 2012, the husband had filed an appeal against the Andhra Pradesh High court judgment which upheld the family court's decision of refusing divorce.

The former couple got married in 1993 but after the differences arose between them, the wife stayed with her parents for most of the time till 1997. The husband alleged that cruelty was met out to him and filed an appeal for divorce in 1997 before a family court in Hyderabad.

Also read:Maha: Woman delivers baby in one-rupee clinic at Thane station

Intro:After 22 years of struggling to get a divorce and working out a marraige, the Supreme Court gave a big relief to the husband ordering dissolution of marraige terming it " unworkable, emotionally dead, beyond salvage and broken down irrevertably."


Body:The bench comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MR Shah observed that though the interest of the wife had to be kept by providing a permanent alimony, it was a fit case for dislloution of marraige. The court has directed the husband to pay Rs20 lakhs alimony within 8 weeks.

The court said,"If both parties to the marraige agree for separation permanently, in that case, certainly both the parties can move the competent court. Only in case where one of the parties do not agree and give consent, only then the powers under Article 142 of the constitution of India are required to be invoked to do substantial justice between the parties, considering the facts and circumstances of the case."

In 2012, the husband had filed an appeal against the Andhra Pradesh High court judgement which uphled the family court's decision of refusing divorce.

The former couple got married in 1993 but after the differences arose between them, the wife stayed with her parents for most of the time till 1997. The husband alleged that cruelty was met out to him and filed an appeal in 1999 before a family court in Hyderabad.


Conclusion:
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.