New Delhi: The sudden and tragic demise of Sushant Singh Rajput in mysterious circumstances has triggered a huge debate on all that is wrong with Bollywood, especially the incestuous relationship that exists within the film fraternity and the discouragement, if not hostility, with which it greets ‘outsiders'.
While the Mumbai Police are still probing the cause of his death, Sushant’s colleague in the industry, Kangana Ranaut, another “outsider” who struggled hard to find her place in the industry, has stirred the hornet’s nest by talking about a 'movie mafia' that exists in Mumbai and the nepotistic tendencies that this mafia promotes.
Her detailed interview to a private television channel recently has dredged up a lot of muck and brought the issue of nepotism to the centre stage.
One of the allegations against the 'Bollywood Mafia' after Sushant Singh’s tragic end is that it drives talented outsiders out of the business even as it promotes mediocrity among 'nepo-kids' (children of film stars). This is not to say that star kids are not talented. Many of them have blossomed as excellent actors. But, there is no denying that they have a safety net.
Interestingly, what is true of the cinema world in Mumbai is also true of the world of politics in Lutyens’ Delhi and elsewhere in the nation. Nepotism is so well entrenched that it is now central to the way of life. However, even if it is a bit late in the day, one must identify this trend and call it out because it militates against democratic dharma, which demands a level-playing field for everyone.
Producer-Director Karan Johar, who has been at the receiving end of Kangana’s accusations has not denied the part played by nepotism in the film industry. He has stated publicly that when a producer launches the son of a movie star, he is wanting to be in a 'comfort zone' because eventually, it's also a commercial thing.
Read:| Court can take a call on the CBI probe into Sushant's death: Senior lawyer
“A big movie star’s son is going to get the eyeballs….you don’t want to take a chance eyeballsey”. In other words, he says, producers feel 'protected' when they are in that (nepotism) zone.
Is this not true of politics as well? Just look at the way party tickets are distributed in a parliamentary election and realise that 'being connected' matters a lot – or so it did for much of the seven decades that have gone by after independence.
Nepotism is so well entrenched that the children and grandchildren of individuals who held public offices at the national level in India many decades ago, almost deem it their right to represent the constituencies which their grandfathers or grandmothers represented and live in the very houses which their forefathers occupied in Lutyens’ Delhi. They get so attached to these houses that after a while they even forget that these dwellings are public property. And, in case they are not living in those houses, the second and third-generation politicians demand that they be converted into memorials or mausoleums.
The Nehru-Gandhis are the real initiators of this trend in the national politics and in Lutyens’ Delhi. It began in the days of our first Prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru when he ensured the appointment of this daughter, Indira Gandhi as the President of the Indian National Congress in 1959. What happened thereafter is fairly well known to the people of India. As one member of this family succeeded another as the country's prime minister, the family’s familiarity with our republican constitution grew weaker and weaker and it began to imagine that India was indeed a monarchy.
As this family entrenched itself and started promoting its relatives and friends, the Nehruvian School became the dominant school and ambitious bureaucrats, academicians, thought leaders, artists, media professionals and businessmen became part of it. All of them realised that only those who were part of this caravan could climb the ladder in bureaucracy, academia, media and so on. Barring honourable exceptions, all the governors, vice-chancellors, newspaper editors, TV anchors, Padma Award winners were members of this school. There was no such thing as respect for diversity or other points of view. In politics, those who made it to the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha in the days of the Congress Party’s complete dominance had to be part of this ideological ‘biraadri' or their fellow-travellers.
So, the whims and fancies of this family became the law and the nepotistic attitude of this family was dignified and universalised by it when it promoted the children and grandchildren of its loyalists and hangers-on.
All this went on unchallenged until Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister in May 2014. He has emerged as the arch disrupter and has substantially worked towards the creation of a level playing field in Lutyens’ Delhi. Kangana is doing the same in Bollywood – fearlessly calling out those who shamelessly promote nepotism in the Hindi film industry and even launch vicious attacks on talented outsiders who dare to find a place for themselves in Bollywood.
For example, it appears to be common practice to crack jokes in television shows and public events at the expense of newcomers like what Shahrukh Khan and Shahid Kapoor did to Sushant Singh Rajput in an IIFA Awards event. Kangana Ranaut also talks about some extremely worrying situations, like when a noted Bollywood Director told Sushant Singh that he was not drifting, but drowning.
Read:| Mumbai Police buying time to ensure evidence is destroyed: Sushant's family lawyer
Further, Sushant began life in Maldiha in Purnia district, Bihar. He was a National Olympiad winner in physics. A rank holder in an entrance exam for a top-of-the-line engineering college. He had eclectic interests ranging from reading to mathematics and astronomy to dance, music and cinema. Was he too much of an intellectual for Bollywood, because many 'stars' have publicly gloated over their poor academic record.
Karan Johar has confessed that he was told at a young age that if he wanted to make Hindi movies, 'you do not need to be qualified….and this does not speak highly of the fraternity I come from”.
This writer is not a movie buff, but he got to see some of Sushant’s work – his lead roles in 'Chichchore' and the biopic on M.S.Dhoni, for example. His sensitive portrayals in both these movies are there for all to see. So, how come Bollywood, instead of embracing and promoting such talent,
chose to drive him into a corner? If there is a “mafia” or to put it more accurately, a cosy club of nepotists, it must be identified and called out. The issues raised by Kangana Ranaut calls for some serious debate and cleaning up.
Further, if Sushant’s death is not to go in vain, the democratisation of Bollywood is essential and a level-playing field is essential. But, this can happen only if the current national indignation at the treatment meted out to Sushant Singh is turned into a national movement to encourage the work of talented 'outsiders' and, more importantly, gets reflected at the box office.
