ETV Bharat / bharat

Ayodhya hearing LIVE: SC commences hearing for 20th day

Ayodhya hearing LIVE: SC commences hearing for 20th day
author img

By

Published : Sep 5, 2019, 12:31 PM IST

12:24 September 05

Rajeev Dhavan: In 1885-1886 Raghuvar Mahant Das was the Mahant which is evident from a document. On 22nd-23rd December the incident took place.
We also accept that the Nirmohi Akhara were the Shebaits. Management rights of Ram is in the outer courtyard, and not the inner courtyard.

  • Shebait is the person who serves the deity, consecrated in the temple as a Devata. Shebaitship represents maintanence and management of the deity. 

11:37 September 05

Ayodhya hearing LIVE: SC commences hearing for 20th day

New Delhi: The Supreme Court commenced hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case for the 19th day with the senior advocate Dr Rajeev Dhavan resumes his argument, on behalf of the Sunni Waqf Board and other Muslim parties in the land dispute case..

The conclusions drawn from Advocate Dhavan’s arguments so far-

-The only claim is against the claim of management and charge of the temple.

-The suit was restricted to the inner courtyard.

-Earlier the Hindus were worshipping at the inner courtyard only.

-In the intervening night, the idol was shifted from courtyard to the central dome.

-The phrase janmasthan (birthplace) is meaningless. 

-In 1885 they (Hindus) first denied to accept Mahant Raghuvardas as a 'Mahant' but later accepted it.

12:24 September 05

Rajeev Dhavan: In 1885-1886 Raghuvar Mahant Das was the Mahant which is evident from a document. On 22nd-23rd December the incident took place.
We also accept that the Nirmohi Akhara were the Shebaits. Management rights of Ram is in the outer courtyard, and not the inner courtyard.

  • Shebait is the person who serves the deity, consecrated in the temple as a Devata. Shebaitship represents maintanence and management of the deity. 

11:37 September 05

Ayodhya hearing LIVE: SC commences hearing for 20th day

New Delhi: The Supreme Court commenced hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case for the 19th day with the senior advocate Dr Rajeev Dhavan resumes his argument, on behalf of the Sunni Waqf Board and other Muslim parties in the land dispute case..

The conclusions drawn from Advocate Dhavan’s arguments so far-

-The only claim is against the claim of management and charge of the temple.

-The suit was restricted to the inner courtyard.

-Earlier the Hindus were worshipping at the inner courtyard only.

-In the intervening night, the idol was shifted from courtyard to the central dome.

-The phrase janmasthan (birthplace) is meaningless. 

-In 1885 they (Hindus) first denied to accept Mahant Raghuvardas as a 'Mahant' but later accepted it.

Intro:Body:

Ayodhya hearing LIVE


Conclusion:
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.