ETV Bharat / bharat

'Teesta water deal signficant in protecting India's interests'

In an exclusive interview with ETV Bharat's senior correspondent Chandrakala Choudhury, India’s former high commissioner to Bangladesh, Ambassador Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty talked about the importance of the pending Teesta river deal between India and Bangladesh.

'Teesta water deal signficant in protecting India's interests'
'Teesta water deal signficant in protecting India's interests'
author img

By

Published : Dec 17, 2020, 11:19 PM IST

Updated : Dec 18, 2020, 10:16 AM IST

New Delhi: Prime Narendra Modi and his counterpart in Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina during a virtual bilateral summit on Thursday signed seven agreements including the inauguration of the Haldibari-Chilahati rail link, the launch of a stamp to commemorate the birth centenary of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the Bangabandhu-Bapu digital exhibition and a Ba-Bangamata wall and few agreements ranging from Hydrocarbons to agriculture. The agreements have paved a path towards development and strengthening of ties between the two nations.

'Teesta water deal signficant in protecting India's interests'

However, Teesta river water has been a tough deal to sign. It has been hanging fire for more than 35 years with no conclusion yet. An agreement was reached between the two countries but could not be inked yet.

In an exclusive interview with ETV Bharat, India’s former high commissioner to Bangladesh, Ambassador Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty said, “Whatever agreements are been signed till now are doable. Agreements related to sovereignty, maritime boundary, land boundary, connectivity, coastal shipping has been signed between the two nations.

But sharing of river waters is not an easy issue; it is a very complex issue and it is tied up with India’s domestic politics as West Bengal does not agree to the sharing agreements that have been drafted. 54 trans-border rivers flow from India into Bangladesh. We have only one agreement – the Ganga Waters agreement which was signed in 1996 for 30 years and that is also going to come up for review soon."

He says that the availability of water overall has been going down for various reasons which include demography and rise in population. While rice cultivation which is very water-intensive on sides, climate change, and hydropower have contributed to unavailability of water especially in the lean season. ”There is a mismatch of availability of water between the lean season and excess season. It is a management issue also. How do you we manage so much water in one season and lack of water in the other? he added.

“So this is a long term process and there is a need to look at it in terms of larger river basin system, involve Nepal and Bhutan where many of these rivers originate. This is a long term problem and cannot be easily sorted out overnight because it is a far too complex issue to come across a table for negotiation. There are other countries involved; water availability is an issue too. It has to perhaps go with things like how one can change the pattern of agriculture that uses less water. These are some of the issues that should be kept in mind,” ambassador Chakravarty explained.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee opposed the Teesta water-sharing formula citing global warming having its impact on the glaciers that feed the river, and the NDA government decided not to invoke Article 253 of the Constitution to get the bilateral deal done. The Constitution allows the Centre to sign any international or bilateral treaty despite the objection of a state.

Does China matters in the Teesta River?

China is extending about 1 billion dollars to Bangladesh for the Teesta River’s management which has become a matter of concerns. When India and Bangladesh agreed for Teesta river water sharing formula for the yet-to-be-inked deal, China was not a factor. But now there is a Chinese angle to the Teesta river management in Bangladesh and it seems the question of renegotiating of the Teesta river deal has arisen.

Former ambassador Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty said, “Particularly the Teesta which is in Northern Bengal is not something that will be to India’s liking because that is a very sensitive area. Chinese do not come in civilian mode but probably send people in disguise or PLA due to which India’s relation with China turned bad. We cannot afford to have Chinese doing projects in Teesta just south of the Siliguri corridor which is a very sensitive area for us. The Siliguri corridor is the land access from West Bengal to Assam and Sikkim.

So, I think that kind of project will be resisted by India and Bangladesh has to understand that it is a sensitive area to bring in Chinese people who can damage our national security. In my view, India will of course oppose it."

Talking about renegotiating the Teesta river deal, Chakravarty said, “I think there can be a renegotiation of the river deal. Both the countries can again sit down and see how best it is done, but the point is that if it is going to be scaled down in terms of sharing water then Bangladesh will also not like it. If India has to pander to West Bengal’s demand that they need water, there will be difficulties. This is a complex issue,"

India-Bangladesh countering China

“China is seeking entry into the Bay of Bengal in various ways just as it has got entry into the Arabian Sea through Pakistan and Gwadar. So this is a game plan and China is trying to create a hegemonic order with China at the top in Asia. We will have to see how best both the countries can manage and counter these approaches particularly in the Bay of Bengal. Hence, we must keep our neighbours close to us so that India can pursue its interest particularly in the light of what China is doing," the former diplomat pointed out.

In the virtual bilateral summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had described Bangladesh as an 'important pillar of India’s “neighbourhood first” policy'.

The Ministry of External Affairs on Pakistan 1971 genocide further told media, “There is no denying that state-sponsored oppression against people of Bangladesh led to the death of over 3 million people and more than 200,000 women were raped and tortured”. “We deeply respect, understand the sentiments expressed by PM Sheikh Hasina”, it added.

During the press briefing following the India-Bangladesh virtual summit, Smita Pant, Joint Secretary, Bangladesh-Myanmar, in MEA said, “At the bilateral summit, both sides agreed and highlighted the need for safe early, and sustainable repatriation of displaced persons from Rakhine state back to Myanmar”.

She also added that PM Modi has accepted PM Sheikh Hasina’s invitation to visit Bangladesh on March 26th, 2021 and that it was a fruitful summit that included the inauguration of significant projects and detailed discussion in all areas of cooperation.

Also Read: U.S election 2020 outcome: What it means for India and the world if Trump or Biden wins

New Delhi: Prime Narendra Modi and his counterpart in Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina during a virtual bilateral summit on Thursday signed seven agreements including the inauguration of the Haldibari-Chilahati rail link, the launch of a stamp to commemorate the birth centenary of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the Bangabandhu-Bapu digital exhibition and a Ba-Bangamata wall and few agreements ranging from Hydrocarbons to agriculture. The agreements have paved a path towards development and strengthening of ties between the two nations.

'Teesta water deal signficant in protecting India's interests'

However, Teesta river water has been a tough deal to sign. It has been hanging fire for more than 35 years with no conclusion yet. An agreement was reached between the two countries but could not be inked yet.

In an exclusive interview with ETV Bharat, India’s former high commissioner to Bangladesh, Ambassador Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty said, “Whatever agreements are been signed till now are doable. Agreements related to sovereignty, maritime boundary, land boundary, connectivity, coastal shipping has been signed between the two nations.

But sharing of river waters is not an easy issue; it is a very complex issue and it is tied up with India’s domestic politics as West Bengal does not agree to the sharing agreements that have been drafted. 54 trans-border rivers flow from India into Bangladesh. We have only one agreement – the Ganga Waters agreement which was signed in 1996 for 30 years and that is also going to come up for review soon."

He says that the availability of water overall has been going down for various reasons which include demography and rise in population. While rice cultivation which is very water-intensive on sides, climate change, and hydropower have contributed to unavailability of water especially in the lean season. ”There is a mismatch of availability of water between the lean season and excess season. It is a management issue also. How do you we manage so much water in one season and lack of water in the other? he added.

“So this is a long term process and there is a need to look at it in terms of larger river basin system, involve Nepal and Bhutan where many of these rivers originate. This is a long term problem and cannot be easily sorted out overnight because it is a far too complex issue to come across a table for negotiation. There are other countries involved; water availability is an issue too. It has to perhaps go with things like how one can change the pattern of agriculture that uses less water. These are some of the issues that should be kept in mind,” ambassador Chakravarty explained.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee opposed the Teesta water-sharing formula citing global warming having its impact on the glaciers that feed the river, and the NDA government decided not to invoke Article 253 of the Constitution to get the bilateral deal done. The Constitution allows the Centre to sign any international or bilateral treaty despite the objection of a state.

Does China matters in the Teesta River?

China is extending about 1 billion dollars to Bangladesh for the Teesta River’s management which has become a matter of concerns. When India and Bangladesh agreed for Teesta river water sharing formula for the yet-to-be-inked deal, China was not a factor. But now there is a Chinese angle to the Teesta river management in Bangladesh and it seems the question of renegotiating of the Teesta river deal has arisen.

Former ambassador Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty said, “Particularly the Teesta which is in Northern Bengal is not something that will be to India’s liking because that is a very sensitive area. Chinese do not come in civilian mode but probably send people in disguise or PLA due to which India’s relation with China turned bad. We cannot afford to have Chinese doing projects in Teesta just south of the Siliguri corridor which is a very sensitive area for us. The Siliguri corridor is the land access from West Bengal to Assam and Sikkim.

So, I think that kind of project will be resisted by India and Bangladesh has to understand that it is a sensitive area to bring in Chinese people who can damage our national security. In my view, India will of course oppose it."

Talking about renegotiating the Teesta river deal, Chakravarty said, “I think there can be a renegotiation of the river deal. Both the countries can again sit down and see how best it is done, but the point is that if it is going to be scaled down in terms of sharing water then Bangladesh will also not like it. If India has to pander to West Bengal’s demand that they need water, there will be difficulties. This is a complex issue,"

India-Bangladesh countering China

“China is seeking entry into the Bay of Bengal in various ways just as it has got entry into the Arabian Sea through Pakistan and Gwadar. So this is a game plan and China is trying to create a hegemonic order with China at the top in Asia. We will have to see how best both the countries can manage and counter these approaches particularly in the Bay of Bengal. Hence, we must keep our neighbours close to us so that India can pursue its interest particularly in the light of what China is doing," the former diplomat pointed out.

In the virtual bilateral summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had described Bangladesh as an 'important pillar of India’s “neighbourhood first” policy'.

The Ministry of External Affairs on Pakistan 1971 genocide further told media, “There is no denying that state-sponsored oppression against people of Bangladesh led to the death of over 3 million people and more than 200,000 women were raped and tortured”. “We deeply respect, understand the sentiments expressed by PM Sheikh Hasina”, it added.

During the press briefing following the India-Bangladesh virtual summit, Smita Pant, Joint Secretary, Bangladesh-Myanmar, in MEA said, “At the bilateral summit, both sides agreed and highlighted the need for safe early, and sustainable repatriation of displaced persons from Rakhine state back to Myanmar”.

She also added that PM Modi has accepted PM Sheikh Hasina’s invitation to visit Bangladesh on March 26th, 2021 and that it was a fruitful summit that included the inauguration of significant projects and detailed discussion in all areas of cooperation.

Also Read: U.S election 2020 outcome: What it means for India and the world if Trump or Biden wins

Last Updated : Dec 18, 2020, 10:16 AM IST
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.