Chhattisgarh only state to file annual reports mandated under RTI Act, UP does none

Uttar Pradesh has not published a single report obligatory under the RTI Act since the transparency regulation came into being in 2005 whereas Chhattisgarh is the only state which has introduced all its annual reports mandated under RTI Act.

New Delhi: Uttar Pradesh has not published a single report mandatory under the Right to Information (RTI) Act since the transparency law came into being in 2005 while Chhattisgarh is the only state which has brought out all its yearly reports, a voluntary group said on Friday.

Transparency International India (TII) came out with its report on the eve of RTI Day, when the transparency regime started in the country on October 12, 14 years ago. The report analyses the functioning of 28 state information commissions in the country.

"Chhattisgarh is the only state which has published (also available on website) annual reports from the years 2005 to 2018. However, only nine out of 28 states (excluding Jammu and Kashmir) have published annual reports up to the year 2017-18. Publishing annual report is mandatory as per RTI Act 2005," TII said.

Section 25(1) of the RTI Act mandates the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions to prepare a report annually on the implementation of the provisions of the act during that year and forward a copy thereof to the appropriate government.

The state transparency report published by TII states that while Chhattisgarh has strictly complied with the provisions of the law, Uttar Pradesh is the only state which has not published even a single report in the last 14 years.

Representation of women as information commissioners is also dismal in state panels with only seven of them having a lady member each which is approximately 4.5 percent of the total sanctioned posts.

An Information Commission is supposed to have 10 Information Commissioners and one Chief Information Commissioner.

The data presented by TII shows that 24 out of 155 posts of Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners are vacant in the central and state panels. The reports say the number of vacancies have halved since last year.

"Although all states (except Bihar) have a functional website, the websites are only ritualistic except for states like Central Information Commission, Rajasthan, and Gujarat, giving basic information and providing no real details about the working of the Information Commissions," the report said.

Among the highly populated states, highest number of complaints and appeals (4.61 lakh) landed at the Information Commission in Tamil Nadu since 2005 when RTI Act came into being while on the other extreme of spectrum is Telangana which received only 10,619 and West Bengal which received 20,058 cases and complaints during the period, TII said.

In the states with a population less than one crore, state information commission of Himachal Pradesh received 8,549 appeals and complaints since 2005 while Mizoram received just 206 appeals and complaints during the period.

"RTI legislation has been utilised to reorient public policy and it has facilitated the healthy working of democracy. It is a tool to make the governance system transparent and accountable and not a weapon against the government," said Rama Nath Jha, executive director of TII.

He said it is high time to stand united to fight and reinvent the network of pro-transparency civil society groups of country to intensify struggle for the Right to Information 2.0.