ETV Bharat / bharat

‘Disconnect Between Prosecution, Govt Counsel On Chargesheet Date’, SC Seeks Telangana DGP Presence

author img

By Sumit Saxena

Published : 2 hours ago

A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti has directed the Telangana DGP to be present before it in a case where the state government's counsel could not answer queries.

‘Disconnect Between Prosecution, Govt Counsel On Chargesheet Date’, SC Seeks Telangana DGP Presence
Representational Picture (ETV Bharat/ File)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed its surprise that the Telangana government counsel could not answer the court’s queries regarding the dates of filing of the chargesheets regarding a matter and directed the Telangana Director General of Police (DGP) to be present before it either physically or through virtual mode, on the next date of hearing.

The matter was heard by a bench comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti. The apex court was hearing a plea by Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) leader Vatti Janaiah Yadav. He was earlier associated with the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS).

“Appearing for the State of Telangana, Ms. Devina Sehgal, learned counsel submits that the chargesheet has been filed in all the cases. When the court wanted to know when the chargesheets were filed, the government counsel expressed want of information”, said the bench, in its order.

The bench said the prosecution and arguing counsel were not in sync with case details regarding when the chargesheet was filed. “We are indeed surprised by the response of the government counsel as the respective dates of filing of the chargesheets should either be readily accessible or the instructing officer should have indicated the relevant dates of the chargesheets together when the information was given that chargesheets were filed. The disconnect between the prosecution and the government counsel is clearly discernible”, said the bench, in its order.

The apex court scheduled the matter for further hearing on October 4. “The DGP, State of Telangana should be available to participate in the proceeding either physically or through virtual mode, on the next date. Before the next date, the details be filed by the state’s counsel”, said the bench.

Yadav had moved the top court last year claiming criminal persecution by the then BRS-led government after he quit BRS and joined BSP. In October last year, the apex court had sought the response from the state government and provided Yadav interim protection from arrest in FIRs against him.

Read more

  1. School Jobs Scam: SC Asks Kolkata Court To Expeditiously Decide TMC Leader Kuntal Ghosh's Bail Plea
  2. 'Eviction Can Be Restored, Demolition Is Irreversible, Not Good To See Women, Children On Road': SC On Bulldozer Justice

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed its surprise that the Telangana government counsel could not answer the court’s queries regarding the dates of filing of the chargesheets regarding a matter and directed the Telangana Director General of Police (DGP) to be present before it either physically or through virtual mode, on the next date of hearing.

The matter was heard by a bench comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti. The apex court was hearing a plea by Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) leader Vatti Janaiah Yadav. He was earlier associated with the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS).

“Appearing for the State of Telangana, Ms. Devina Sehgal, learned counsel submits that the chargesheet has been filed in all the cases. When the court wanted to know when the chargesheets were filed, the government counsel expressed want of information”, said the bench, in its order.

The bench said the prosecution and arguing counsel were not in sync with case details regarding when the chargesheet was filed. “We are indeed surprised by the response of the government counsel as the respective dates of filing of the chargesheets should either be readily accessible or the instructing officer should have indicated the relevant dates of the chargesheets together when the information was given that chargesheets were filed. The disconnect between the prosecution and the government counsel is clearly discernible”, said the bench, in its order.

The apex court scheduled the matter for further hearing on October 4. “The DGP, State of Telangana should be available to participate in the proceeding either physically or through virtual mode, on the next date. Before the next date, the details be filed by the state’s counsel”, said the bench.

Yadav had moved the top court last year claiming criminal persecution by the then BRS-led government after he quit BRS and joined BSP. In October last year, the apex court had sought the response from the state government and provided Yadav interim protection from arrest in FIRs against him.

Read more

  1. School Jobs Scam: SC Asks Kolkata Court To Expeditiously Decide TMC Leader Kuntal Ghosh's Bail Plea
  2. 'Eviction Can Be Restored, Demolition Is Irreversible, Not Good To See Women, Children On Road': SC On Bulldozer Justice
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.