New Delhi: Legal experts on Thursday debunked the theory propounded by the Uttar Pradesh Police that absence of semen from the body of Hathras victim suggested that she was not raped, saying the presence of sperm cannot be an essential ingredient to prove the crime.
Senior advocates Rebecca John and Vikas Pahwa told a news agency that absence of semen on the body of alleged gang-rape victim as claimed by the police in the forensic report was of no consequence for the prosecution of accused persons for the offence as there was a dying declaration that cannot be discredited.
So what (the semen was not found)? The offence of rape doesn't require its presence. And anyway there was a dying declaration.
Also Read: Hathras Dalit girl was not raped, says UP ADG
Some extraordinary evidence will be needed to discredit the dying declaration, John said.
Agreeing with her, Pahwa said the presence of semen was not an essential ingredient and among the essential ingredients to establish that she was gang-raped were victim's oral statements and injuries on her body etc.
The body can be washed, cleaned. It depends. It is also to be seen how much time difference was there between the offence and the medical examination. If the medical examination was conducted immediately after the rape, there would be a presence of semen, otherwise won't, explained the expert.