New Delhi:The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a plea of Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader Bikram Singh Majithia seeking quashing of FIR registered against him by Punjab Police under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act of 1985 and gave him liberty to approach Punjab and Haryana High Court.
A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant, and PS Narasimha questioned senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Majithia as to why a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed before the top court when other remedies are available. The bench said that Majithia can move the High Court for his relief including the bail application, which will be heard by the division bench.
We are not inclined to entertain the petition filed under Article 32 of the petition. Petitioner is at liberty to move the division bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking quashing of the Fir and for grant of bail, the bench said. Senior advocate V Giri, appearing for the Punjab government, said that his bail plea has been rejected by the special court as well as the High Court. However, the state cannot oppose if the court is directing the matter to be heard by the division bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court, he said.
Majithia, a former minister in the state government was given protection from arrest by the top court till February 23 in view of the assembly polls in Punjab and he had unsuccessfully contested from Amritsar East Assembly seat. Majithia is currently lodged in Patiala jail after his bail pleas were rejected.
On January 31, the top court had granted relief to Majithia and directed the Punjab Police not to arrest him till February 23 in a drugs case so that he can undertake electioneering, saying we are a democracy where politicians are permitted to file nominations and it should not get the impression that motivated cases are filed. Flagging the sudden spurt in criminal cases against political opponents just before the assembly polls, a bench headed by Chief Justices N V Ramana had asked the counsel for the Punjab government, to advise the authorities to ensure that it does not get the impression that the state is acting against political rivals with vindictiveness.