Mumbai:The counsel of late jesuit priest Stan Swamy, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case who died earlier this month, urged the Bombay High Court on Friday to monitor the magisterial inquiry into his death by invoking its "parens-patriae" jurisdiction.
Senior counsel Mihir Desai, who represented Swamy in the High Court, said that although the activist was dead and there existed no question of him being granted bail anymore, the high court need not consider the late priest's appeals seeking bail abated. He said that there existed previous Supreme Court judgements ruling that high courts could exercise "parens-patriae jurisdiction" or act as the parent of such appellants, who were not in a position to make decisions for themselves.
Advocate Desai urged the high court to permit Swamy's aide, father Frazer Mascarenhas, be permitted to participate in the inquiry supposed to be conducted into Swamy's death as per section 176 of the CrPC. He urged the court to direct that the inquiry be conducted as per the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) guidelines, and also to direct the magistrate to submit a copy of the inquiry report before the high court so that the same can be monitored.
"We are looking at a peculiar situation here since the appellant died while the appeals were pending. But, the HC has wide powers," Desai said. He cited the Bhopal gas tragedy case, and the case of comatose nurse Aruna Shanbaug, where courts had exercised their parens-patriae jurisdiction.
Appearing for the National Investigating Agency (NIA), Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh said that while the agency had no objection to father Mascarenhas participating in the inquiry, the court need not pass any directions on the magistrate following the NHRC guidelines since that was part of procedure and would be followed. Singh said that the NIA, however, had an objection to the HC asking for the probe report.
Also read:Have 'great respect' for Stan Swamy's work: HC while hearing his bail appeals posthumously
"The HC is presiding over two appeals challenging the accused's rejection of bail on medical grounds and merits," he said. "With the accused's death, the appeals stand abated as per section 394 of the CrPC," he said.
The high court then directed advocate Desai to give written submissions on whether the appeals stood abated, or if they could be amended so that the HC could continue exercising jurisdiction over the matter. The NIA then intervened to say that it had two additional submissions to make.