New Delhi:The Supreme Court Tuesday expressed concern over delay in appointment of High Court judges and told the Attorney General (AG) that nothing happened in the past several months since it last heard the case and passed an order, and stressed that “appointment of Chief Justice of a very sensitive court is pending”.
A bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia said, "70 names (for the appointment of High Court judges) are pending for a period of 10 months…..basic processing takes place for these 70 names. In High Courts 70 judges are not there, as some of them do not get appointed, on average 50 percent. If your view would be known then collegium will take a call but if it does not come then. The time frame fixed under the judgment was about four months, let us take five months....”.
Justice Kaul told AG, "I am flagging it so that you can take instructions, at least the High Court recommendation up to the end of April must be with the collegium (apex court) and what I received is service names and Bar names are not received".
Attorney General R Venkataramani, representing the Centre, said he can come back to the court in over a week’s time. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing Centre for the Public Interest Litigation (PIL), submitted that he can provide a comprehensive list on three categories. Objecting to Bhushan's submissions, the AG said the government has everything.
Justice Kaul said, “Mr Bhushan, I have the information of how many names are pending because of the position I am in…which have been recommended by High Court (name of the candidates for appointment as judges), which has not been sent to the collegium…second, it says where the recommendations are made and they have not been either appointed or returned back. Third, cases reiterated second time not appointed...."
Justice Kaul said, “First one has nine names, second has seven names…..26 transfers (of judges) are pending and appointment of Chief Justice of a very sensitive court is pending”.