National

ETV Bharat / state

AAP MP Raghav Chadha moves SC challenging his suspension from Rajya Sabha

In his plea before the apex court, Chadha argued that his suspension was in clear violation of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) as well as Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Rajya Sabha Secretariat and its chairperson are respondents in the petition filed before the court.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and MP Raghav Chadha has moved the Supreme Court challenging his suspension from the Rajya Sabha. Chadha was suspended from the Upper House on August 11 for “gross violation of the rule, misconduct, defiant attitude and contemptuous conduct." The action against him came in response to complaints lodged by four MPs Sasmit Patra, S Phangnon Konyak, M Thambidurai and Narhari Amin.
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and MP Raghav Chadha

By ETV Bharat English Team

Published : Oct 10, 2023, 6:51 PM IST

New Delhi:Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and MP Raghav Chadha has moved the Supreme Court challenging his suspension from the Rajya Sabha. Chadha was suspended from the Upper House on August 11 for “gross violation of the rule, misconduct, defiant attitude and contemptuous conduct." The action against him came in response to complaints lodged by four MPs Sasmit Patra, S Phangnon Konyak, M Thambidurai and Narhari Amin.

The MPs accused him of including their names on a motion without their consent and a complaint was lodged before Jagdeep Dhankar, the Vice-President and Rajya Sabha chairman. Their names were allegedly added by Chadha on a motion seeking the constitution of a Select Committee to study the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2023.

Also read:Setback for Raghav Chadha: Delhi Court vacates interim order, AAP MP may lose govt bungalow

In his plea before the apex court, Chadha argued that his suspension was in clear violation of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) as well as Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Rajya Sabha Secretariat and its chairperson are respondents in the petition filed before the court.

The plea contended that there exists a categorical prohibition against the suspension of any member for a period exceeding the remainder of the sessions. He has been suspended since the last hour of the monsoon session of Parliament this year. Chadha submitted that he is not able to attend the meetings of the Standing Committee on Finance and the Committee on Subordinate Legislation, which continue their work even when Parliament is not in session.

The plea said in terms of Article 101 (4) of the Constitution, the effect of an indefinite suspension, particularly outside the period of session is to de facto create a vacancy after 60 days, which also shows the prima facie illegality of the impugned action. Chadha’s plea contended that a suspension cannot have the effect of expulsion and create a vacancy in the House.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

...view details