Washington: A Taliban's victory does not mean a "better future" for Afghanistan as there could be local outbreaks of civil war and insurgencies against the terror group, said political commentator Harlan Ullman. In an opinion piece in The Hill, Ullman, a senior adviser at the Atlantic Council, said that the few had predicted that a collapse of Afghanistan would take place "so suddenly" with Taliban control surging to about 85 per cent of the country. "Obviously, if or when the Kabul government falls or cedes power, nation-building and democratization, again, will be losers. A Taliban victory, likewise, does not mean a better future for that country. Very likely, Taliban rule will vary across the provinces," Ullman said.
"In some cases, local warlords will remain in power, accommodate the Taliban or suffer strangulation by being cut-off from access beyond its limited areas of control. That could ignite local outbreaks of civil war and insurgencies against the Taliban. Whether these will be persistent and widespread will depend on the brutality of Taliban rule and the capacity of Afghans to continue the fight after decades of violence and conflict," he added. Ullman believes that Pakistan will attempt to impose greater influence on the Taliban through the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) and this will doom "Prime Minister Imran Khan's outreach to improve relations with the U.S. to failure."
Also Read: Taliban sweep across Afghanistan's south; take 4 more cities
"The U.S. has no illusions about Pakistan's past duplicity in denying its support of the Afghan Taliban. And, as extremism grows, so will western concerns about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons," Ullman wrote. The expert is of the opinion that China would play a "more reserved role" as instability is not good for business. "Aside from an interest in Afghanistan's rare earth mineral and other resources, China's Belt and Road initiative is not suited for these conditions and thus won't reach Afghanistan," he wrote.