Washington: The candidacy of Pete Buttigieg, the first openly gay contender to launch a major presidential campaign in the US, has sparked enthusiasm from a sector of the LGTBI community who see his surprisingly strong performance in the first two nominating contests as a sign that the country was becoming less homophobic.
But the more progressive segment of that voting bloc is decidedly indifferent toward him, viewing the former Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, as too conservative and a member of the Democratic Party's establishment wing.
Buttigieg came out on top in the Iowa caucuses and finished second behind Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in the New Hampshire primary. Both contests were held this month.
"I go back to the days of Harvey Milk. I worked on his supervisorial campaign when electing an openly gay person was such a struggle," Gwenn Craig, an African-American veteran LGTBI community activist in the San Francisco Bay area.
Milk was the first openly gay elected official in the history of California.
"What's striking to me is that so few people bring it up at all... Right now it's not a question. It's not a commentary that people have been making about his campaign," she said.
Read Also:The Indispensable Indo-US partnership
Craig, however, is backing one of Buttigieg's rivals, Elizabeth Warren, saying that the Massachusetts Senator's progressive ideals more closely coincide with her own.
A prominent HIV/AIDS activist in San Francisco Dana Van Gorder said the fact there has been a mixed response to Buttigieg within the LGBTI community was a sign of the progress made in the area of gay rights.
Journalist and activist Ann Northrop, an organizer of an event - the Queer Liberation March - that is a radical alternative to New York City's main Pride parade, told that she has mixed feelings about Buttigieg.