Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Friday stayed a move by Rapid Metro Rail Gurgaon Ltd for terminating the operation of the Rapid Metro Rail Project in Gurugram from September 9.
A division bench directed the company to continue operations on both its lines till Monday.
The order by the division bench headed by Justice R.K. Jain came on a petition of the state-run Haryana Mass Rapid Transport Corporation Ltd and Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, formerly Haryana Urban Development Authority, fixed on Friday for urgent hearing.
India's first fully privately-financed metro system, the Rapid Metro has been facing a funds crunch six years after it started commercial operations on November 14, 2013, say insiders.
According to the petition, Rapid Metro Rail Gurgaon Ltd invoked the termination clause through the impugned notice dated June 7.
However, in view of the order dated February 4, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Delhi, the respondent was required to take permission from Justice D.K. Jain (retd), who has been appointed to supervise the operation of the resolution process pertaining to IL&FS
Infrastructure and its group companies, including Rapid Metro Rail Gurgaon Ltd.
Rapid Metro Rail Gurgaon Ltd has filed an application before the authority which is being contested by the present petitioners, including the validity of the termination notice and also for initiation of termination process by the petitioner as well.
Read More:Goa hoteliers demand cut in GST on room tariff
The final order is yet to be passed by the said authority, however, the operation of the Rapid Metro Rail Project, as per the impugned termination notice of the respondent, will come to an end on September 8, said the petitioners.
They have made requests to the Rapid Metro Rail Gurgaon Ltd and to the competent authority to extend this date, however, the respondent has not communicated any decision to that effect.
As such, the petitioners said they were left with no alternative but to approach the High Court to impugn the said termination notice dated June 7 to that extent as the same is totally illegal, arbitrary, and against the larger public interest.
Also, it was against the true intent of the orders passed by the NCLAT as the same can only come in operation after the requisite permission is granted for handing over and taking over of the operations by the competent authority, the petition added.