New Delhi:The Supreme Court has expressed displeasure over the delayed manner in which the Gujarat government challenged a decision of the high court in a matter related to grant of compassionate pension to a police constable who was compulsorily retired after a disciplinary enquiry and dismissed its petition with a cost of Rs 25,000. The apex court, which was anguished that the state government filed the appeal with a “gross and unexplained delay, also said the circumstance in which direction for compassionate pension was issued was that one child of the man was mentally challenged and another polio affected. In February 2017, a single judge of the high court had directed the authority to grant compassionate pension to the man with effect from March 21, 2002 and pay arrears within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order.
The division bench of the high court had refused to interfere with the single judge order. Disapproving the manner in which the appeal was filed, the apex court noted in its order that there was a delay of 856 days in filing the special leave petition against the high court order by the deputy commissioner of police, traffic branch, Ahmedabad and the home department of the state of Gujarat. A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah said the circumstance in which direction for compassionate pension was issued under Rules 78 and 79 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules 2002, was that one child of the man was mentally challenged and another polio affected.
Read:SC refuses to entertain plea seeking courts interference against Mamata Banerjee, Moloy Ghatak