New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday directed its Registrar to communicate with the Additional Sessions Judge at Lakhimpur Kheri and get a tentative timeline for the conclusion of a case wherein union minister Ajay Mishra's son, Ashish Mishra is accused along with 12 others. The case pertains to the alleged murders of protesting farmers in October 2021 in Lakhimpur Kheri.
The bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Krishna Murari while hearing the bail petition of the accused Mishra observed that the court has to balance the interest of the accused, as it does of the victims and the society at large. "We have to see that the accused, who is inside the jail for over one year, also has rights. Now the charge sheet has been filed and charges have been framed. The victims and witnesses also have their rights. Now, we have to balance all the rights in the case," it said.
The apex court also asked the Uttar Pradesh government, which opposed the bail plea of Ashish Mishra terming the offence as "grave", to file an affidavit with regard to the status of the second case filed over the killing of three occupants of the SUV, which allegedly mowed down the farmers. It further asked the Additional District and Sessions judge hearing the second case related to the killing of the occupants of the car, to consider the desirability of framing charges.
During the hearing, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for Mishra argued before the court that Mishra was not present in the car and there was no killing with bullet injury as per what is recorded. Rohatgi highlighted that Mishra has been in jail for one year and that it's long incarceration.
Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave opposed the bail plea and said that no bail should be granted in case of such 'a grave offense', especially when even the trial court and the HC have refused to do so. "Eight people were killed in cold blood. His father had even said we will teach you a lesson. Witnesses are being attacked, these are powerful people. If someone can kill people merely because they are agitating, then nobody is safe in this democracy," argued Dave.