Shillong: The Meghalaya High Court said over 13 MT of coal was illegally mined, transported and discovered which the state sought to pass off as coal mined prior to the imposition of the ban on coal mining. The court said Justice Katakey report on the reassessed coal available at depots across four districts East Jaintia Hills, West Khasi Hills, South Garo Hills and South West Khasi Hills stated that 19,54, 250 MT of coal was available in the state as compared to a September report by Chief Secretary DP Wahlang who stated that 32.56 MT of coal was available for auction.
"What is apparent is that in addition to the previously illegally mined coal measuring approximately 19,54,259 MT, a further 13 lakh MT of coal was illegally mined, transported and discovered which the state sought to pass off as coal mined prior to the imposition of the ban," a full 3-member division bench headed by Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee which heard an PIL on Wednesday said in an order. "There is, no doubt, further amounts of coal (will be available), in addition to the total quantity of 32.56 lakh MT as indicated in the chief secretary's report of September 20, 2022," the order stated, adding that "it is evident that the state continues to play fast and loose with the court."
The court also wanted Justice Katakey, who suggested drone videography on December 2, to expedite the same. The next hearing on the matter will be held on February 7. The High Court also issued a contempt order against East Jaintia Hills Superintendent of Police (SP) after a report revealed illegal mining of coal being carried out in the district. Justice BP Katakey had sought a report from the district Deputy Commissioner based on a news report stating that "wonder caves in Jaintia Hills are at risk from rampant mining".
The report furnished by the Deputy Commissioner on December 3, revealed attempts at illegal mining of coal in the recent past including blasting that has endangered the Krem Liat Prah cave situated at Shnongriam village, the court stated. The district administration had also reported that directions have been issued to the relevant Magistrate to undertake frequent inspections and to impose prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.