Chennai:In his continuing turf war with the elected government, Tamil Nadu governor RN Ravi is in the eye of the storm on Thursday over his remark justifying his sitting over the Bills passed by the state assembly for months as an option available to the Raj Bhavan. And swift was the reaction of Chief Minister and DMK president MK Stalin who reminded him that the office of Governor is nothing but a shorthand for the state government and he should not think of himself as The Great Dictator.
His penchant for debunking the dominant political narrative and turning public events to counter it has made him a whipping boy for the ruling DMK and its allies. The recent controversy arose following his remark at an interaction with civil services aspirants at the Raj Bhavan on Thursday.
Responding to a question on the role of a governor in the context of different parties in power at the Centre and the State, he said “Withholding assent to a Bill means it is 'dead'. It is an option available to the Governor as per the Constitution. A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court had made this clear. In a decent way, it is as good as rejected.”
In a strongly worded 4-page statement, Stalin charged the Governor with acting in contravention of the Constitution and working against the interests of the state. “Earlier, he was creating confusion among the public through his controversial speeches on political and social issues. Now, he is engaged in disrupting administrative discipline by telling things about the legislative procedure that are contrary to the truth. Habitual in keeping Bills pending, he is escaping from performing his duties. 14 Bills are awaiting his assent. This is not only a failure on his part but an attempt at crippling.”
“Such casual utterances on executive decisions by a person who has taken oath of secrecy is a violation of constitutional norms. His act of not granting assent to Bills re-adopted by the assembly has to be considered as an act of stymieing the state administration. Keeping Bills pending inordinately does not behoove well of a constitutional functionary. Further, trying to rationalize this in public domain, lacking legal sanctity, is a very wrong precedent,” the Chief Minister said and urged him to take back his views, as demanded by the oath of office he has taken.