Disappointed: SC pulls up NGT, stays Baghjan 10-member panel

The Supreme Court on Thursday said it is disappointed with the National Green Tribunal (NGT) order on setting up a 10-member committee, which included an Oil India Ltd (OIL) official, to examine the damage caused by fire, to the biodiversity at Assam's Baghjan oil well.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday said it is disappointed with the National Green Tribunal (NGT) order on setting up a 10-member committee, which included an Oil India Ltd (OIL) official, to examine the damage caused by fire, to the biodiversity at Assam's Baghjan oil well. A bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud noted that the NGT included OIL officials on the committee, despite holding the corporation responsible for losses. The bench also comprising Justice M.R. Shah put on hold the green tribunal's order for constituting the committee.

The bench said, "We are surprised that NGT first holds that Oil India responsible for the damages to the environment and for destroying the wetlands and then its officer is made a member of the committee to go into these issues." The top court passed the order on an appeal challenging the February 19 tribunal order. The bench emphasized the tribunal "must have some alacrity and concerns for the environment". The panel was tasked to assess damage to the environment and develop a remedial restoration plan, including Dibru-Saikhowa National Park, the Maguri-Motapung Wetland.

Well, number 5 at Baghjan in Tinsukia district had caught fire on June 9, 2021, killing two of OIL's firefighters at the site. Justice Chandrachud noted OIL was accused of polluting the wetlands, but its MD was put on the inquiry committee. Senior advocate Siddharth Mitra, representing petitioner Bonani Kakkar, called it a breach of the principle of justice and stressed that somebody having a direct conflict of interest was asked to adjudicate the matter.

Read: PIL filed in NGT Bhopal against diamond mine in Buxwaha

He pointed out another committee led by former High Court judge B.P. Katakey has submitted a comprehensive report on the matter, which was followed by a progress report, and if the new committee is set up, it will eventually delay the entire process. Shah observed why another committee was set up after the first report what is this? After a hearing in the matter, the top court stayed the NGT order and slated it for further hearing after two weeks. The bench said it will constitute a new committee, which would examine all the issues and submit a report expeditiously. "We may monitor this ourselves. We are disappointed by the manner in which the NGT has simply pushed this off its hands," said the bench.

Read: NGT dismisses private resort's review petition; Orders demolition of illegal site

In February this year, a bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice A.K. Goel said it "prima facie" agrees that there was a failure on the part of the OIL in taking safety precautions. The tribunal had emphasized that there was a need for ensuring that such incidents did not recur. On June 24, 2020, the NGT had constituted a committee headed by former High Court judge Katakey to look into the matter and submit a report.

Read: NGT decides compensation for workers injured in explosion at firecracker factory in Maharashtra's Palghar

(IANS)