New Delhi:Delhi Police have registered an FIR against 'The Wire' after BJP leader Amit Malviya registered a complaint alleging that the news website "forged documents with a view to malign and tarnish" his reputation. Malviya, who is head of BJP's Information and Technology Cell, had filed a criminal complaint against The Wire and its top editors with the Special Commissioner of Police (Crime) on Saturday.
In his complaint, the BJP leader sought registration of FIR under sections 420, 468, 469, 471, 500 r/w 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In FIR names mentioned are The Wire, its founding editors Siddharth Vardarajan, Siddharth Bhatia and MK Venu, and Jahnavi Sen, deputy editor and executive news producer.
The complaint said FIR should also be registered against the Foundation of Independent Journalism and other unknown persons "for the offences punishable u/s 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 469 (Forgery for purpose of harming reputation), 471 (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record.), 500 (Punishment for Defamation) r/w 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860".
The complaint to Delhi Police said that "the accused persons have with common intention conspired to maliciously defame the complaint and the BJP by spreading false news to the public". The matter pertains to Meta stories which were "retracted" by The Wire. It retracted the stories after Meta and various other experts pointed out critical flaws in their reporting.
Amit Malviya had alleged in a statement on Friday that on October 6, 2022, The Wire published a report claiming that Meta (the parent company that owns Facebook and Instagram) had removed an Instagram post within a few minutes of it being uploaded by a private account namely "Cringearchivist". The report claimed that the company regularly colludes with members of the BJP in removing content deemed unfavourable to the party.
He further said that on October 10, 2022, the news website went on to claim that "I was the nodal point, interfacing between the party and Meta, for said censorship activity, having been bestowed certain "XCheck" and other privileges by the company". "As per the report, this status had bestowed on me the following powers overriding any filters, algorithms, vetting, verification or any other checks and balances within the company," Malviya said.
He alleged that the report went on to cite alleged internal correspondence of Meta to justify its claims, alleging had used said privileges to take down a total of 705 posts to date.
"On October 11, 2022, Meta's Communication Head, Andy Stone, issued a categorical denial and stated that the documents presented by 'The Wire' in its report were fabricated' and that the "Xcheck" status had been mischaracterized. Once Meta issued this statement, 'The Wire' should have at the very least paused its coverage of this issue and commenced an internal audit. Instead, on the same day, it went on to publish yet another malicious report claiming to have accessed further internal emails of Meta employees, namely those exchanged between Andy Stone and his team, purportedly trying to effect a coverup," he had said in a statement on Friday.