Nora vs Jacqueline: Delhi Court to hear Nora Fatehi's defamation case on Jan 21

Actor Nora Fatehi recently filed a defamation suit against Jacqueline Fernandez in money laundering case involving 'conman' Sukesh Chandrashekar is likely to hear on January 21.

New Delhi: A Delhi court is likely to hear on January 21 a criminal complaint filed by actor Nora Fatehi against Jacqueline Fernandez for allegedly defaming her by "unfairly dragging" her name into a Rs 200 crore money laundering case involving 'conman' Sukesh Chandrashekar. Fatehi, a Canadian citizen, has also arrayed 15 media organisations as accused in her complaint.

The complaint was brought up before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Snigdha Sarvaria, who assigned the matter to Metropolitan Magistrate Kapil Gupta. Metropolitan Magistrate Gupta, thereafter, posted the matter for January 21 to decide whether to take cognisance on the complaint. Fatehi, who is likely to appear before the court on January 21, had said in her complaint filed on December 12 that she has a pristine reputation apart from a rapidly progressing career which has quite obviously threatened her rivals who are unable to compete with her on fair footing.

The defamatory statement was made by Fernandez in bad faith and with mala fide intention and was circulated by the media houses made accused in the complaint with an intent to defame her, she said. The complaint claimed the allegations made by Fernandez, also a Bollywood actor, that Fatehi had received gifts from Chandrashekar were wrong.

The only time the complainant spoke to Chandrashekar was when his wife, Leena Maria Paul, made her speak to him over speakerphone at the event in Chennai where the complainant was invited by Leena. At the event, the complainant was gifted an iPhone and a Gucci bag by Leena. No gifts were ever received by the complainant from Chandrashekar, Fatehi has said in the complaint.

Fatehi also denied she had received a luxury car from Chandrashekar and said it was part payment to her brother-in-law Bobby Khan, who Chandrashekar had approached for directing a movie. Since the complainant had never even spoken to Chandrashekar let alone having met him, hence the imputation made by the Fernandez and the subsequent publishing of the same by the accused media houses are untrue, the complaint said.

The court had on November 15 granted bail to Fernandez, who is an accused in the money laundering case. She was not arrested in the case. The court had on August 31 taken cognisance of a supplementary charge sheet filed by the Enforcement Directorate and asked Fernandez to appear before it. Fernandez, who was summoned by the ED several times in connection with the investigation, has been named as an accused in the supplementary charge sheet. (PTI)