New Delhi: The Supreme Court in a scathing remark against the Centre stated courts cannot remain, mute spectators when citizens' constitutional rights are violated by executive policies. The apex court remarked on the Centre's contention that vaccine policies need no judicial interference as the executive is operating on expert medical and scientific advice. The top court said the executive's wisdom is not second-guessed.
The SC observed the Court has to determine whether the vaccine policy adheres to the "standards of reasonableness, militates against manifest arbitrariness and protects the right to life of all persons". The SC made the observations on the suo moto case on distribution of Covid 19 essential supplies and services.
The top court observed that it is assuming a "dialogic jurisdiction" where various stakeholders are provided with a forum to raise constitutional grievances concerning mismanagement of the pandemic. Acting as an open court, the Court would conduct deliberations with the executive wherein existing policies will be evaluated and seen if they survive the constitutional scrutiny.
Also read:Last year's policy can be adopted this year too, SC on 12th board exam