New Delhi: The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) on Monday said that the Supreme Court judgment on Ayodhya had given precedence to the faith and beliefs of one side and while the verdict was 'delivered', justice was not.
The apex court's November 9 verdict allowed Hindus to build a Ram temple on the disputed plot in Ayodhya, while asking the central and Uttar Pradesh governments to give the Sunni Waqf Board an alternative five-acre plot in the holy town.
"We have always maintained that the resolution of the dispute must be through a negotiated settlement, failing which, the only way is to resolve the matter through a court verdict. This is the only manner in which a secular republic governed by the rule of law can deal with such a dispute. The verdict has now been delivered, not justice. There are, however, certain premises of the judgment that raise serious questions.
"...the end result of the verdict has given precedence to the faith and beliefs of one side. Instead of dealing with the petitioners in this case, the verdict deviates by widening the ambit, referring to Hindus and Muslims," CPI(M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury said, reading out a statement after the party's politburo meeting here.
The statement said while the verdict stated 'unambiguously' that the demolition of the Babri mosque in December, 1992 was a 'serious violation of law', but finally, it handed over the site to the very forces responsible for this 'criminal assault'.
"The verdict states that the desecration of the mosque in December 1949 by the illegal placing of idols within the mosque was also a grave violation of law. Yet, the entire disputed site has been handed over to the violators of law," it said.
The party maintained that the fact that there was no dispute prior to 1857 could not prove that Muslims were not in exclusive possession or that the mosque was not used for prayers.
Read:Ayodhya verdict will shape India's political, social landscape: US media