New Delhi:Increasing women’s age of marriage from 18 to 21 is nothing but a superficial idea and will do little to improve the health of mothers and infants and will ultimately lead to the criminalisation of sexual activities, say, experts.
They say amending the law by fiat will not further gender equality, women’s rights or empowerment of girls.
The government’s proposals to revise the minimum age of marriage have drawn sharp criticism from woman and child rights experts all across the country. A task force appointed by the Women and Child Development Ministry in June has been consulting civil society members on this.
Expressing concern, over 100 civil society organizations with extensive experience in research and advocacy on adolescents and young people, child rights and women rights have made three submissions to the task force, urging the government against increasing the age of marriage by citing coherent reasons as to why the announcement of a possible increase of age is a matter of concern. There are lots of questions popping up regarding revising the age of marriage.
In a joint statement, the rights organizations asked how increasing the minimum age of marriage is a step forward when it denies many more women matrimonial status and rights.
They also questioned how will it help to criminalise families whose survival needs and insecurity compel them to not just marry early, but to also enter the workforce early.
However, the organizations, individuals have urged the government against increasing the age of marriage, claiming "it will not further gender equality, women's rights or empowerment of girls, and will do little to improve the health of mothers and infants".
"It is only in the most superficial sense that having 21 years for both men and women is a sign of gender equality, but somehow this idea has great appeal in liberal circles”, the statement endorsed by over 100 CSO’s and 2500 young voices said.
The women rights experts are of the view that child marriage has been on a decline and therefore, there is no point of increasing age of marriage but more emphasis should be given on schooling and jobs.
Speaking to ETV Bharat, Mary E John, Director, Centre for Women Development Studies who is also a part of the endorsement said, “It is just a superficial idea that people who are educated and wealthy, marry at a higher age, it is not actually a poor person who waits for three years to get married then 21 years is not going to become wealthy for that reason. Unless there are schools, colleges available for the poor, or jobs that are meaningful, what is going to change by simply postponing the marriage age by 3 years? The government has not thought through it properly".
“We have a history of differential age; one cannot suddenly equalize overnight because we have a social system which tends to think that we should be ‘Hypergamists’ meaning the boy should be superior to the girl within a caste. This idea has broken down in the western countries but in India, we still maintain the hierarchy. Therefore, 18 should be kept as it is; it is just a minimum age to marry, not the age that one ought to marry. It works only as a guard in a situation where families who are in difficult circumstances like in case of school dropouts, poverty, and then a girl sitting at home are married off.