Ayodhya: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to attend the Bhumi Pujan for Ram Mandir on August 5. The 70-year-old dispute on a religious structure at Ayodhya was settled on November 9, 2019 when a five-judge bench paved the way for construction of Ram Mandir. Several people had played a key role in spearheading a movement for the building of the temple at the site.
The events related to Ram Mandir dates back to 1950 when the first title suit was filed by Gopal Singh Visharad asking for the right to worship the idols installed at ‘Asthan Janmabhoomi’. Devotee Gopal Singh Visharad, who had filed a lawsuit in a lower court seeking the right to pray at the site, however, died in 1986 and the legal fight was later taken up by his son Rajendra Singh.
Subsequently, in 1959, Nirmohi Akhara entered the fray and filed the third suit, seeking possession of the site. It claimed itself to be the custodian of the spot where Lord Ram was believed to have been born. Mahant Bhaskar Das was the sarpanch of the Nirmohi Akhara, one of the main claimants of the title suit in the Ayodhya case. Das represented the sect for several years.
The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) started the nationwide movement for the construction of the temple at the site in Ayodhya. Ashok Singhal, the president of VHP, was one of the people behind the campaign in 1984 that demanded a Ram mandir in Ayodhya. He is considered as one of the architects of the Ram Mandir movement.
Mahant Avaidyanath was a leader of the Lord Ram Janambhoobi movement who also played an important role. Avaidyanath founded the Sri Ramjanmabhoomi Mukti Yagna Samiti to liberate Ram's birthplace.
The founder president of Bajrang Dal and veteran BJP leader Vinay Katiyal supported the Ram Janambhoombi Movement. He also volunteered for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh to accomplish the mission.
READ: Ayodhya Timeline: Here's how the events unfolded
As events unfolded, a fresh suit was filed by former VHP vice-president Deoki Nandan Agarwala in the name of Lord Ram for declaration of the title and possession in its favour at the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court.