National

ETV Bharat / bharat

Allow widow access to monthly pension NCDRC to SBI

New Delhi: The apex consumer forum on Saturday has directed the State Bank of India (SBI) to allow the widow of a defence personnel access to her monthly family pension which was withheld.

NCDRC asks SBI to allow widow access to monthly pension

By

Published : Feb 2, 2019, 11:11 AM IST

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) bench said that freezing the woman's bank account and denying her access to pension has amounted to deficiency in service.

Read:| Budget 2019: Lets have a look at major take aways from different sectors

A bench of presiding member Anup K Thakur and member C Vishwanath directed SBI's branch in West Bengal's Nadia to release the withheld pension, Manika Sarkar stated.

"The respondent (Sarkar) was a customer of the petitioner (SBI) as she was having a joint account in the petitioner's bank, where her pension was regularly deposited. The petitioner was a service provider. The petitioner bank froze her account and wrongly denied her access to her pension, which amounted to deficiency in service," the bench said.

Read:| Budget 2019: From where money comes and finally where it goes

Sarkar had been receiving pension in her savings bank account, jointly held with her son, Suman Kalyan Sarkar, after her husband's death.

According to the woman's complaint, Suman, an employee of SBI, was charged with misappropriation of money after which the bank authorities froze Manika's account depriving her of the pension, which was her sole source of sustainance.

A district forum in its April 24, 2018 order had said that pension was meant for survival of the pension holder, which cannot be attached or withheld by anyone, and directed the authorities to allow Sarkar to withdraw her pension amount.

Read:| This budget is a joke on Farmers: Yogendra Yadav

The NCDRC, while dismissing the revision petition filed by the bank, said it was wrong on the part of the bank to withhold Sarkar's pension thereby making her suffer for her son's mistake.

"It is clear from the evidence available on record as well from the orders of the lower forum, that no fault was committed by Sarkar. She cannot be made to suffer, only due to the reason that she was having a joint account with her son, who had allegedly committed an offence. The petitioner bank had no reason to withhold the pension," the bench said.

For All Latest Updates

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

...view details