Kevadia (Gujarat): The concept of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has the potential to transform the Indian legal landscape by providing a platform for millions of people to settle their grievances, Chief Justice of India NV Ramana said here on Saturday. With adequate cooperation from all stakeholders, ADR can emerge as a tool of social justice in India, he said. Speaking at the inaugural event of a two-day national conference on mediation and information technology organised near the Statue of Unity here, the CJI asked courts to take an active effort to make negotiation and mediation mandatory as part of case management. He also said those engaged in the justice delivery mechanism need to have a thorough understanding of new technologies, which have the potential to simplify the process.
"The concept of ADR, through Lok Adalats, Gram Nyayalayas, mediation and arbitration centres, has the potential to transform the legal landscape of India by providing millions of people a platform to settle their grievances," the CJI said. It can reduce pendency, save judicial resources and time, and allow litigants "a degree of control over the dispute resolution process and its outcome", he said, adding that it is "one of the most empowering methods of resolving disputes as they maximise the participation of stakeholders". Justice Ramana also said that while conflicts are inevitable aspects of our lives, they can be resolved through understanding.
"Conflicts have a human face. One must have the foresight to look beyond the conflict. A dispute should not spoil your relationship. Prolonged litigation can drain resources and cause animosity, and conflicts can be resolved in a neutral environment, where both parties are in a win-win situation. After all, life is a balancing act," the CJI said. Justice Ramana asked the courts to take an active effort to make negotiation and mediation mandatory as a part of case management and said lawyers must try their best for pre-litigation settlement and advise clients to approach Lok Adalats for the greater benefit of parties. He asked the parties to not use dispute resolution forums as a mere delaying tactic. Further, judicial officers must understand the parties and their economic conditions without bringing any adjudicatory flavour to the proceedings, he said.
Also read:Governments maligning judges is new, unfortunate trend: SC