Bhubaneswar:Condemning the closure of the Lingaraj Temple rituals for two days, Odisha Law Minister Prithviraj Harichandan warned sevayats against politicising temple matters and termed such instances as 'unfortunate and unacceptable.' Discussing the matter at a high-level meeting convened at his residence on Wednesday, the Minister said strict action will be taken against the indiscipline within temple precincts.
The Lingaraj temple rituals had come to a grinding halt since Monday evening following conflicts between sevayat groups regarding their duties and rights to perform certain rituals.
The meeting was attended by the Debottar Commissioner, Khurda Collector, Secretary, Law Department, Local MLA, and other key stakeholders. All the participants agreed to form a single-member commission headed by a retired High Court judge which will function under the Temple Act and be tasked with submitting a detailed report within two months to resolve the dispute for all times to come.
The Law Minister warned that no amount of disruptions in temple rituals will be tolerated. “Those playing politics with the temple and the Lord must stop immediately. If such disruptions continue, the government will take strict action,” Harichandan said.
The controversy erupted on Makar Sankranti when the sevayats had disagreements over distribution of duties for the day's rituals. A group of Badu Nijog servitors reportedly did not allow the Brahman Nijog to do the "khira aauta" ritual for observation of 'Ghruta Kamala', claiming their rights to perform it. This led to arguments and the temple’s schedule was halted. As a result, the deity was made to stay on the Makar Mandap out of the sanctum sanctorum for two nights.
Despite two meetings organized by the temple administration, no resolution could be reached. Heated arguments ensued between the Brahman Nijog and Badu Nijog representatives. While the Brahmana Nijog accused the administration of failing to resolve the conflict, claiming that their rightful rituals to conduct the "khira aauta" were being overlooked, the Badu Niyog refuted the allegations, citing an 1863 document to justify that it is their prerogative.